If you reread post number 25 & 30 you will see the firm's name (in post 30). I had the spelling wrong but it's close enough to show you I wasn't making up a name, and I didn't look it up on the internet.
The reason I know about this situation is a close relative had the procedure done in 1976, then had them removed in 1993 to 95 (can't remember exactly). They were in the shape I descibed yesterday. This close relative joined the class action suit immediately after the removal. Around 1996-97, she received part one of the settlement ($19,000 after the lawyers took their 1/3). At that time she was told that she would be receiving an additional settlement (not part of the first) due to the condition of her implants, and a few other determiners.
This second settlement is "supposed" to be paid to selected women but is in the appeal process at this time, and should be a similar amount to the first (The attorneys are the real winners). She received a letter from the firm several months ago saying it should be another 2-4 years before they reach a settlement or the appeal is won by the manufacturers.
The law firm is:
Krause & Rollins
Attorneys at Law
310 Groveland ave
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55403
attorney assigned to my relatives action is James (Jim) Hovland.
Regarding someones question about males in the suit, I have no knowledge of that. I would assume there are males.
In conclusion, I don't know much more then what I've told you yesterday and today. The science is beyond me. However, I did see a perfectly healthy female grow exceedly diseased over a 15 year period.
If I offended anyone during our discussion yesterday I apologize. It is also possible I didn't get this to all the people involved yesterday.
Gary