Posted on 07/20/2003 9:02:58 PM PDT by FairOpinion
The supermarket chain Tesco has admitted testing controversial technology that tracks customers buying certain products through its stores. Anyone picking up Gillette Mach3 razor blades at its Cambridge store will have his or her picture taken. The Guardian, alerted by Katherine Albrecht, director of US-based Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy and Invasion and Numbering, to the use of the smart electronic tags, has found that tags in the razor blades trigger a CCTV camera when a packet is removed from the shelf. A second camera takes a picture at the checkout and security staff then compare the two images, raising the possibility that they could be used to prevent theft.
"Customers know that there are CCTV cameras in the store," said a spokesman for Tesco. He went on to insist that the aim of the trial was to provide stock information and not security, but the manager of the Cambridge store, Alan Robinson, has already described how he presented photos of a shoplifter to police.
The trial uses radio frequency identification (RFID) in which tiny chips can communicate with detectors up to 20ft away. The chip can then return information - anything from a unique serial number to more complex product details. Or, as in Tesco's case, it could trigger a camera.
Retailers have hailed the technology as the "holy grail" of supply chain management but civil liberties groups argue that the so-called "spy chips" are an invasion of consumers' privacy and could be used as a covert surveillance device.
The technology is mostly used to track batches of products through the supply chain. But manufacturers want to go a step further and tag each individual product: everything from yoghurt pots to clothes.
One potential problem with RFID tags is that they can still work long after the product has been bought. If the tags become as ubiquitous as the manufacturers would like, people could be bristling with the chips in clothes and possessions. Anyone from police to potential thieves could work out exactly what they carry. Manufacturers, however, insist that the chips can be disabled at the point of sale.
"You can disable the tag by erasing the data on it and this can be done at the checkout," said Jon Parsell of Bedford-based RFID Components, which supplies RFID systems to retailers.
Transport for London is also using RFID-style chips in its new Oyster smart cards to allow users to travel around the tube network. The intention is that registered users will have information such as their names and addresses stored on the cards, which would eventually replace season tickets.
A spokesperson for TfL said that the entry and exit points of each journey made by Oyster users were recorded and that, technically, it would be possible to track people through the tube network. Nicole Carroll, marketing director for TranSys, the consortium responsible for implementing the system, told the Guardian that all the journeys made by a user would remain stored in a central computer for the lifetime of the card.
Barry Hugill of Liberty expressed concern about "function creep" - information recorded for one purpose and used for another. "We want quite clear legal guidelines as to what information companies, government agencies, local authorities are allowed to glean [and] what they can do with it," he said.
Technology automatically IDs consumers (takes pictures as you buy a product)
Some people were skeptical, but here is another supermarket chain in the UK, which is testing the chips.
Note they can track what you buy, take pictures AND track your items even in your home.
So what would happen if a confused customer simply picked up all of the razor blades, and then put them all back on the shelf after making several trips around the store?
What if a different customer picked up these same razor blades and decided to put them all back on the shelf, but in different locations throughout the store?
And what if someone else picked them up and decided they didn't want them once they got to the register? Or decided they didn't want them after they paid for them?
On a side note- for some odd reason, Gillete razor blade cartridges are an item that is stolen a lot here in the UK. Many stores won't even put them on the shelves, you have to ask and pay at a counter.
On what charge?
Wouldn't the names of those voting for and lobbying for such an edict be public information?
I wouldn't put it past them either.
And many here would be applauding it as "necessary to stop the terrorists".
I guess once they get the RFID stuff implemented, the next step will be the cashless society.
Some would state that would be "the line" for a lot of folks.
Yep. The total control grid, as Alex Jones calls it.
Your every move is tracked, every purchase databased, every decision analyzed.
The planning begins.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.