Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should NASA put shuttle debris on public display?
Associated Press | 7/20/03 | AP

Posted on 07/20/2003 3:08:37 PM PDT by hemogoblin

CAPE CANAVERAL — NASA officials are delicately seeking advice about what to do with the 84,000 shattered pieces from Columbia, cautiously broaching the idea of putting some shuttle parts on display.

There are mixed feelings among the survivors of the astronauts.

“It touches everybody who sees it,” said Jonathan Clark, husband of astronaut Laurel Clark. “It has a tremendous impact on you. It makes you realize the importance of space exploration.”

Kirstie McCool Chadwick, sister of pilot Willie McCool, said she supports the debris being used for research, but “I don’t know what the purpose of displaying it in public would be. I’m not sure that it makes sense to me.”

Officials from several cities have written NASA asking for pieces of Columbia for their own memorials, and curators at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington have been holding informal discussions with the space agency.

A decision may come by the end of this month. For now, the debris is spread on the floor of a hangar at the Kennedy Space Center. It will remain there until the end of August when the Columbia Accident Investigation Board is expected to issue its report on the cause of the disaster. The shuttle broke apart over Texas on Feb. 1, killing all seven astronauts.

“One thing we’re not going to do, which was done with the Challenger, is lock it up and bury it and pretend that it didn’t happen,” NASA administrator Sean O’Keefe said recently.

Curators at the Smithsonian museum plan to review the debris to see what pieces they may be interested in acquiring.

“Initially, we wouldn’t have plans for it to go on display, only to collect it for preservation as historic artifact,” said Valerie Neal, a space history curator at the museum. “What we might do in the future, I just don’t know.”

The pieces from Challenger were put into two abandoned missile silos at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station after the 1986 disaster.

Whoever exhibits any pieces of Columbia is going to have to be careful, said curators experienced with collecting debris from disasters.

“It’s not just the objects that are sensitive. It’s the issue behind them that’s sensitive,” said Sarah Henry, vice president of programs at the Museum of the City of New York, which has remnants from the Sept. 11 attacks. “The way you display objects can either exacerbate that sensitivity or be respectful of that.” NASA has also sought guidance on handling the makeshift memorials of flowers and cards left outside its facilities. Joel Walker, NASA’s acting director of center operations directorate, talked with officials at the Oklahoma City National Museum, which honors the 168 people who died in the bombing of the Oklahoma City federal building.

In May, NASA sent out a letter to academics and industry researchers asking for research proposals and suggestions on how best to preserve and manage the debris from Columbia.

The space agency has received about 20 proposals from researchers, said Mike Leinbach, shuttle launch director who oversaw the assembly of the debris in Florida. NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama will be given pieces of debris to study fracture mechanics and overheating. The University of Rhode Island is leading a group of universities that want debris for teaching purposes, to demonstrate to engineers in training how the metal on the shuttle was stressed.

Whatever decisions are made about the debris, Barbara Anderson, mother of Columbia astronaut Michael Anderson, said she hopes the pieces are treated with the reverence they deserve.

“To me it’s more than just a piece of metal,” she said. “It represents their lives, their souls.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: columbia; columbiatragedy; disaster; display; nasa; shuttle; shuttledebris; spaceshuttle; turass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
I think displaying it would be a good idea, but that's just IMHO.
1 posted on 07/20/2003 3:08:37 PM PDT by hemogoblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hemogoblin
I'd rather see a display of original designs vs PC designs.

Such as freon foam vs EPA approved foam and asbestos O-rings vs. PC O-rings. A look-up table of physical properties might also be instructive.

2 posted on 07/20/2003 3:10:58 PM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Like all the jolly good fellows, I drink my whiskey clear....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hemogoblin
Display of OV-102 debris in memorials is appropriate.

NASA should create guidelines for display now and "loan" materials to organizations with plans. Thus, if the display is not suitable, they can always stop the loan of the debris.
3 posted on 07/20/2003 3:15:00 PM PDT by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
Should NASA put shuttle debris on public display?

Yes.

Bump to your reply. We gotta stop this PC environmentalcasesists! Bump to the heroes of the flight that died because of the enviro-whacks!

FMCDH

4 posted on 07/20/2003 3:16:00 PM PDT by nothingnew (the pendulum swings and the libs are in the pit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hemogoblin
“One thing we’re not going to do, which was done with the Challenger, is lock it up and bury it and pretend that it didn’t happen,” NASA administrator Sean O’Keefe said recently.

Amen to THAT! The encasing of the Challenger's remains in a concrete-covered bunker ranks among the WORST things NASA administration has ever done.

The remains of the shuttle should be displayed. We cannot afford to forget our losses, lest we be condemned to repeat them.

5 posted on 07/20/2003 3:19:15 PM PDT by Jay D. Dyson (Threaten me? That's life. Threaten my loved ones? That's death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hemogoblin
I think it is a great idea! Put up the pieces for display, along with a continuous loop of their screams as they burned to death! That would get the visitors in!
6 posted on 07/20/2003 3:19:18 PM PDT by Houmatt (In case you could not tell, I was being sarcastic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hemogoblin
Short answer to the qustion,NO !!!!!!!!
7 posted on 07/20/2003 3:29:46 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Kind of like James Dean's Porsche. It could travel the country, being displayed at local carnivals. They could charge $7 a person to view the remains.
8 posted on 07/20/2003 3:29:56 PM PDT by opinionator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jay D. Dyson
That really is unbelievable. Tossing it into the trash basically.
9 posted on 07/20/2003 3:31:02 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
That really is unbelievable. Tossing it into the trash basically.

If memory serves, that travesty was committed under Dan Goldin. That screwhead was the worst administrator that NASA ever had, bar none.

Sean O'Keefe, on the other hand, has been great. A real upstanding guy. I trust he'll do the right thing.

-Jay

10 posted on 07/20/2003 3:37:07 PM PDT by Jay D. Dyson (Threaten me? That's life. Threaten my loved ones? That's death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Short answer to the qustion,NO !!!!!!!!

Why not? I don't see such a thing as any different than the viewing platform afforded to those who wishes to visit the ruins of the World Trade Center in the months following 9/11.

-Jay

11 posted on 07/20/2003 3:39:45 PM PDT by Jay D. Dyson (Threaten me? That's life. Threaten my loved ones? That's death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: opinionator
James Dean's car?

I don't think so.

12 posted on 07/20/2003 3:41:23 PM PDT by Houmatt (In case you could not tell, I was being sarcastic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jay D. Dyson
That was done so people could pay their proper respects. Not for the morbid.
13 posted on 07/20/2003 3:43:00 PM PDT by Houmatt (In case you could not tell, I was being sarcastic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jay D. Dyson
The WTC site was available for all to see because it happened in a public place and the platform was built for safety reasons and to contain the crowd.

I don't want to see shuttle debris on display anymore than I want to see the debris from fatal plane,train,bus and car crashes.
14 posted on 07/20/2003 3:58:23 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: opinionator
That's how I see it too. Thank you. Something like "Smelly Dave" where a dead whale (Dave) was put on a flat car (train) and sent all over the country so folks could see what a whale looked like. Not only could they see what it looked like, they could also smell it coming from far off. Was that a Stan Freeberg (sp?) recording?
15 posted on 07/20/2003 4:05:51 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Ref post 14. That is correct. Same here.
16 posted on 07/20/2003 4:15:13 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
That was done so people could pay their proper respects. Not for the morbid.

I think the display of the shuttle remains could be done in the same vein as the WTC ruins were. But eh...to each their own.

-Jay

17 posted on 07/20/2003 4:16:55 PM PDT by Jay D. Dyson (Threaten me? That's life. Threaten my loved ones? That's death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hemogoblin
A piece or pieces of Columbia should be displayed in EVERY MEETING ROOM at EVERY NASA and NASA contractor company.

When decisions are being made, the decision makers should be reminded of the consequences of their actions or inactions.

18 posted on 07/20/2003 4:20:53 PM PDT by FReepaholic (My other tag line is hilarious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tscislaw
Excellent idea. I'll go along with that.
19 posted on 07/20/2003 4:22:36 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tscislaw
you get my vote for idea of the day!!!!
20 posted on 07/20/2003 4:25:59 PM PDT by Mr. K (mwk_14059 on yahoo Instant Messenger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson