Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xrp
If they like the products, they are morally obligated to purchase the product. If they don't...well that is where my problem with the consumer/downloader is.

There isn't just one type of consumer downloader. The most avid downloaders are almost always avid consumers of CDs, DVDs, etc. The "casual" downloaders are not economically significant.

Plus there is a price-based solution: If a service like the Apple iTunes store were priced at $0.05 per cut, rather than $0.99 per cut, I'd rather download a quality digital recording than a rip of unknown quality.

Consider the cost of producing a record versus the cost of producing a major movie. The price of music recordings could fall pretty far and still be profitable relative to costs.

29 posted on 07/20/2003 4:27:53 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: eno_; xrp; lelio
On another thread, poster lelio came up with an excellent model that the RIAA should try.

Have kiosks in malls and such that a consumer can go to, pick individual songs at $1.00 per, and have those ripped on a blank c.d. An average c.d. of 15 songs will still bring the desired $15.00 price range for the sellers.

31 posted on 07/20/2003 4:42:21 AM PDT by Vigilantcitizen (game on in 10 seconds....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: eno_
priced at $0.05 per cut, rather than $0.99 per cut

Chicken and egg. The 99 cent price factors in swapping. If most people downloaded rather than swapped, the price could be a nickel. But unfortunately the music cartel will make sure to kill the chicken to get a couple of extra eggs.

38 posted on 07/20/2003 6:21:23 AM PDT by palmer (Lazamataz for Supreme Ruler!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson