Skip to comments.
Trade Deficit Provides China With More Than Economic Advantages
TradeAlert.org ^
| Friday, July 18, 2003
| William R. Hawkins
Posted on 07/19/2003 11:40:19 AM PDT by Willie Green
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Willie Green
Soon the "Republicans" will be in here telling us that deficits are good, huge deficits are even better, things are fine, China is a wonderful place, blah blah...not to worry, prosperity is just around the corner.
Should be thrilling to read. Not...
2
posted on
07/19/2003 11:49:02 AM PDT
by
Regulator
To: Willie Green
I don't know what to say anymore about this subject.
Just imagine what our country would be like if we had a $500 billion dollar trade surplus?!?!?!
3
posted on
07/19/2003 12:01:30 PM PDT
by
raybbr
To: Willie Green
Indeed, if economic troubles can bring "a near collapse of the social and political order" would it not be to Beijing's benefit to see the assertive President George W. Bush defeated for reelection in 2004? The only place where I disagree with the author is the above. It was Bush that approved China for MFN Trade status and his administration's trade policies since day one have been exceedingly beneficial to China (to say the least)...as the numbers so painfully show.
I don't think the PRC leadership would want to risk the great thing they have going with Bush with the uncertainty that another president naturally brings. Even a democrat.
China will bide their time, like they always do, and wait until our country has lost so much of its industry and economic independence that we can no longer effectively counter their global ambitions. To be sure, we are not all that many years away from this.
4
posted on
07/19/2003 12:25:09 PM PDT
by
WRhine
To: Willie Green
"No wonder the individual income tax cuts that have been the center of Bush Administration recovery efforts have had so little effect. The money is being spent on imports to create jobs in foreign lands, not America."
Now where have we seen this before? Sounds like globalisation is in the Democrats best interest.
To: Regulator
Yeah ---and how Americans don't need jobs.
6
posted on
07/19/2003 12:43:50 PM PDT
by
FITZ
To: WRhine
Till they have a fleet of ICBMs that can reach all of the USA in sufficient numbers to scare the hell out of the voters beyond LA.
7
posted on
07/19/2003 12:50:11 PM PDT
by
junta
(Xenophobia a perfectly reasonable response to the feckless stupidity of globalism.)
To: Regulator
Soon the "Republicans" will be in here telling us that deficits are good, huge deficits are even better, things are fine, China is a wonderful place, blah blah...not to worry, prosperity is just around the corner.Yeah, I have to laugh at some of the things they come up with like increasing unemployment is good cause it is of a sign things will be getting better; or, record levels of consumer debt shows that people have confidence in the future. Yikes. You just can't make this stuff up!
Richard W.
8
posted on
07/19/2003 12:51:07 PM PDT
by
arete
(Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
To: Regulator
Soon the "Republicans" will be in here telling us that deficits are good, huge deficits are even better, things are fine, China is a wonderful place, blah blah...not to worry, prosperity is just around the corner.Soon?
9
posted on
07/19/2003 12:55:23 PM PDT
by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: FITZ
Yeah ---and how Americans don't need jobs.Greenspan said this week that we basically don't need manufacturing and if that is now the accepted line of thought, I think that we are in very big trouble.
Richard W.
10
posted on
07/19/2003 12:56:54 PM PDT
by
arete
(Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
To: Willie Green
" In the seminal Chinese treatise on modern strategy Unrestricted War by People's Liberation Army Colonels Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui published in 1999, the ongoing financial crisis is compared to military conflict: "Economic prosperity that once excited the constant admiration of the Western world changed to a depression, like the leaves of a tree that are blown away in a single night by the autumn wind. After just one round of fighting, the economies of a number of countries had fallen back ten years. What is more, such a defeat on the economic front precipitates a near collapse of the social and political order. The casualties resulting from the constant chaos are no less than those resulting from a regional war." It is also argued in Unrestricted War that to attack another country's economy, the aggressor "must adjust its own financial strategy, use currency revaluation or devaluation as primary, and combine means such as getting the upper hand in public opinion and changing the rules sufficiently to make financial turbulence and economic crisis appear in the targeted country or area, weakening its overall power, including its military strength." As the weak American economy contributes to rising budget deficits, it becomes more difficult to provide the funds to modernize or expand the overstretched U.S. military, or to pay for overseas combat operations, or to finance national building in places like Iraq and Afghanistan."
To: arete
You just can't make this stuff up! The things I hear now out of the mouths of people who allegedly know better are so bizarre that I think I got zapped into an alternate reality where all the polarity's have been reversed!
Weird Science: Life in Post-American America.
To: Carry_Okie
Bump to self
13
posted on
07/19/2003 2:41:53 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: A. Pole; sarcasm; hedgetrimmer; harpseal; crazykatz; autoresponder
Every paragraph is important.
To: LibertyAndJusticeForAll
The money is being spent on imports to create jobs in foreign lands, not America.
This has been said on FR over and over again. When will the government start to listen?
Thanks for the ping.
To: Willie Green
I have been told, time and time, again, that the US is a "post-industrial" Nation/society
Whatever that means.....
To: arete
Greenspan said this week that we basically don't need manufacturing and if that is now the accepted line of thought, I think that we are in very big trouble. I wonder, what is the trade balance of Argentina over the last decade and what Argentina is exporting and importing?
17
posted on
07/20/2003 5:15:27 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
To: LibertyAndJusticeForAll; clamper1797; sarcasm; BrooklynGOP; A. Pole; Zorrito; GiovannaNicoletta; ...
Thanks for the heads up. This is an important thread for all.
18
posted on
07/20/2003 5:32:55 AM PDT
by
harpseal
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: A. Pole; Cacique
I wonder, what is the trade balance of Argentina over the last decade and what Argentina is exporting and importing? Cacique
Perhaps you can give a detailed answer to this question.
19
posted on
07/20/2003 5:36:52 AM PDT
by
harpseal
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: harpseal
And when China is involved, the dangers are not just commercial. Beijing's strategy to undermine American industry while building up its own manufacturing base also works to shift the balance of power in Asia. So does undermining U.S. finances with the "twin deficits" and beating down neighboring states in trade battles. In the seminal Chinese treatise on modern strategy Unrestricted War by People's Liberation Army Colonels Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui published in 1999, the ongoing financial crisis is compared to military conflict: "Economic prosperity that once excited the constant admiration of the Western world changed to a depression, like the leaves of a tree that are blown away in a single night by the autumn wind. After just one round of fighting, the economies of a number of countries had fallen back ten years."
This is precisely their policy and agenda...and ultimately, it will lead to war.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson