[Destro]

Listen, I have had enough of a science education background to know that you can't hide thousands of tons of existing WMD stockpiles without a trace. You can hide components and the machines to make them because they are few in number but EXISTING chemical and radiation weapons leave a trace that can be followed.

We can't see upturned dirt from spy satellites? We can and we looked--and we found nothing of existing weaponry. If they were smuggled out--may I ask why the airforce could not see convoys of trucks heading out to Syria? And even this convoy would leave a trace-chemical residue-nuclear residue...traffic jams at border crossings...

[William McKinley]

And I have enough of a science degree to know you can't destroy them without being able to provide some evidence of their destruction.

They had them- they inventoried much of it for the UN after the first Gulf War.

They said they destroyed them, but refused to prove it. And besides, they were supposed to destroy them in front of the UN so as to avoid questions- but they refused to do this.

Spin it all you want. They had them, which is only disputed by the far, far left. Is that where you want to be?