To: tdadams
Who said anything about law? I said definition, a definition that goes back thousands of years.
You might as well argue that circles should also be allowed to be defined as squares. We wouldn't want to exclude circles from the squares of the world and hurt their poor widdle feelings, would we?
So, no, your "circular reference" doesn't hold water because no one was talking about the law, as your example requires.
If people saw on television two men pounding each other in the butt, the public view of fags would radically change to the negative.
64 posted on
07/19/2003 11:41:18 AM PDT by
PatrioticAmerican
(Helping Mexicans invade America is TREASON!)
To: PatrioticAmerican; Admin Moderator
You didn't have to state "the law" specifically. If we're talking about the status of marriage in the U.S., we're talking about the law.
If people saw on television two men pounding each other in the butt, the public view of fags would radically change to the negative.
Charming.
73 posted on
07/19/2003 12:10:10 PM PDT by
tdadams
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson