To: Maria S
I'm beginning to think this is one of those issues that, no matter how much rational reasoning there is, Democrats, in conjunction with their liberal media buds, are going to continue. And there WILL be some confused souls who are incapable of seeing the truth and decide that President Bush really did something worse than Slick ever did! Hillary is running in 2004.
7 posted on
07/18/2003 6:41:22 PM PDT by
FreeReign
(V5.0 Enterprise Edition)
To: FreeReign
Thanks for just ruining my entire weekend!
9 posted on
07/18/2003 6:45:29 PM PDT by
Maria S
To: FreeReign
Hillary is running in 2004. Oh good. You provided me with the perfect segue so I can post my handiwork again. 
11 posted on
07/18/2003 6:47:20 PM PDT by
arasina
(Conservatives, be CONFIDENT! [My new fightin' words!] WE WILL PREVAIL!)
To: FreeReign
For WHAT? The Baath Party nomination for POTUS?
The 'Rats are aligning themselves with Saddam. Somehow, I doubt that is winning strategery. Shrillary is far from being the smartest person in the world, but she is smart enough to stay away from the 2004 Democratic train wreck (the POTUS Nomination).
To: FreeReign; kattracks; kristinn; VRWC
Hillary is running in 2004.Bump. The Future is now. Be afraid, be very afraid. The 'twofer' is coming again...
65 posted on
07/28/2003 11:41:19 AM PDT by
Paul Ross
(A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!-A. Hamilton)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson