Because I've got good instincts and I'm right 99.9% of the time. Besides, it would have made more sense to get rid of him BEFORE he testified, not after. That could have been taken care of in minutes, without any effort. No, I think it far more likely it has something to do with the BBC. They are in a fight for their lives right now. I'm beginning to wonder just who is behind the BBC, and why. They were blatantly anti-war. They were even thrown off one of the British warships in the middle of the war. Everyone over in Iraq has commented on it. There is far more to this story than meets the eye, and it's not the government this time.