[Dimensio]

I just think that Homosexual Sex puts a person more at risk than Heterosexuals.

In that case, your assessment is based upon faulty premises. Without getting into "icky" specifics, it isn't "homosexual sex" that is at higher risk, it's a certain specific sexual act often engaged in by homosexual males. Not every homosexual male engeges in that act, however, and some heterosexuals engage in the same act, and it's just as risky when they do it. Lesbians typically do not engage in that particular act. As such, "homosexual sex" isn't a higher risk activity per se, because there's no single specific action defined under "homosexual sex".

[longtermmemmory]

hiv is just a virus looking to propigate, however homosexuals and in particular the homosexual lifestyle is a fertile breeding ground for the virus.

It just the odds, the odds favor that of 100 heterosexual people and 100 homosexual people, the homosexuals would have an alarmingly higher exposure to the hiv virus. (same comparison with IV drug users who share needles)

Didn't you know the original name of "aids" was glids or some acronym involving the word "gay" or homosexual. This is going back to the era of "patient zero." The homosexual flight attendent who intentionally spread the aids virus to as many people as possible.