Replies

always necessary??? Like I have a pattern you've noticed? I do not sinisterly disregard facts for political purposes. Anything left out of my comments are either for the sake of brevity or an honest oversight.

Sorry I didn't make myself clearer or perhaps I am sorry that you took in so personally, unnecessarily, whichever applies. I meant that it is always necessary to leave out many aspects of a subject in a format such as this due to time and space constraints, just as you replied. That was a general statement, not one directed to you or concerning your style, etc.

Once on All in the Family the Meathead said something to Archie. After a pause Archie asked "Was that a shot?" Don't worry, I didn't take your comment personally, I was just curious as the remark could be read as you just explained or it could have been a shot. FR is a place where one's statements come under scrutiny, rightly so, no problem. Have had some cheers on my posts but also I've had more than one person disagree with me but some have even call my motives sinister, really. I was just seeking clarification on your meaning - was it innocent or was there something more to it? - I do have some detractors on this site afterall. Thanks for the note.

all the best -

Cheers,