If that was all I had, I would not have a case. I have much much more. When the CJ of the state supreme court admits, during in in-person meeting with me in his chambers, that I was entitled to a hearing in the state supreme court on my petition for a writ of mandamus, admits that he authored an appellate court opinion that clearly established that I was entitled to a default judgment in the amount of $1.2 million dollars, that there was no legal authority for appellate court commissioner who illegally exercise judicial authority in case the supreme court wants to send to a black hole because if they actually heard the case as required by the constitution, it would expose the vastness of the judicial corruption in the state, I think it is far, far more than just 'error'.
Why the CJ of the state supreme court agreed to meet with me would take more time to explain that I have right now, but I think you would agree that it would be highly unusual for the top judicial officer in a state to meet with private citizen concerning a legal matter that the state supreme court should have conducted a hearing on but has refused to do so.
agreed, and the refusal on the default seems odd. at least where I am they will usually grant the default but are quite liberal about opening defaults if a basis is presented. but I have zero knowledge of WA procedure.