If you want to read a couple of cases involving Judges and RICO you ought to read
Frega v. U.S. and
Maloney v. U.S.. The Maloney case was a result of the 'Operation Greylord' investigation of corruption in the Chicago state courts.
I've got much better and far, far more evidence that existed in the Maloney case. My biggest problem has been getting the FBI and U.S. Attorney to do their jobs.
Okay, those cases involved judges taking bribes. Do you contend your judge was bribed to receive favorable rulings? And the appellate court? If so, do you have any evidence of this other than a ruling you perceive to be non-sensical?
I'm not saying it doesn't happen. I am saying that I hear a lot of people call judges "corrupt" because they don't like the way the judge ruled. Wrong is not corrupt. Stupid is not criminal. That's why I ask.