Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Regulating Health Claims, CSPI-Style
Consumer Freedom.com ^ | July 17, 2003 | Unattributed

Posted on 07/17/2003 4:36:51 PM PDT by Still Thinking

When you see the American Heart Association's "heart healthy" label, you have some additional, helpful information about the product you're buying. That seems simple and obvious. But European bureaucrats have decided that their subjects are too stupid to handle such information. New rules governing food labels in Europe, would "put an end to endorsements by doctors or other health experts, because they might suggest that not eating the specified food could lead to health problems" (emphasis ours).

Thankfully, the U.S. is going in the opposite direction. The FDA will allow "qualified health claims" on more products -- a move that, of course, riles our friends at Food-Nanny Central. The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), which has long argued that you're too dumb to understand health notices on products like wine, complains that "manufacturers will be able to make claims about the health benefits of their products based on preliminary scientific evidence that may not stand the test of time."

Funny, we seem to remember that CSPI's vaunted "liquid candy" study -- overstating soda consumption by 100 percent -- didn't last a week.

Which makes it even more entertaining that CSPI now complains: "It would be unfortunate if the claim turned out later to be untrue. No one's going to get their money back." CSPI, we note, also doesn't offer a money-back guarantee for the subscribers to their newsletter, who are fed ceaseless finger-wagging and junk science.

CSPI also frets that food companies will take the recent FDA regulations and use "the First Amendment as a license to practice quackery." But the group has quite a lot of quackery to answer for itself. Exhibit number one: CSPI's recent petition to the FDA on acrylamide, which doesn't even meet the test of "preliminary scientific evidence," much less the test of time.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: cspi; foodlabeling; nannystate
Isn't CSPI the crowd normally clamoring for damning labels on any product they don't like on the basis of "truth in marketing" and "informed choice"?? Why not now?
1 posted on 07/17/2003 4:36:51 PM PDT by Still Thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

I'M BACK!!!

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com


STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD (It's in the Breaking News sidebar!)

2 posted on 07/17/2003 4:39:11 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson