Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William McKinley
"Mr. Joseph then came back to Mr. Foley and pointed out that the British had already included the information in a report. Mr. Foley said yes, but noted that the C.I.A. had told the British that they were not sure that the information was correct. Mr. Joseph then asked whether it was accurate that the British reported the information. Mr. Foley said yes.

Other government officials said, however, that Mr. Joseph did not recall Mr. Foley's raising any concerns about the reliability of the information. If he had, they said, Mr. Joseph would have made sure that the reference was not included in the speech."



>>you basic he said he said.
15 posted on 07/17/2003 4:46:20 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Pikamax
And as with most things the Democrats focus on, completely irrelevant. The supposed refutation to Bush's assertion here is that the Iraqis were using something even more advanced. Er, that means they were in fact doing what Bush said.

Which we already knew, due to that scientist pointing us to a gas centrifuge component he had hidden in his backyard.

26 posted on 07/17/2003 4:52:01 PM PDT by William McKinley (No thank you please, it only makes me sneeze)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson