[aristeides]

I just took a look at the Nevada court decision. I take it nobody asked them to issue the injunction they issued. The governor was asking them to issue an injunction ordering the legislature to pass the legislation required within a time limit. Nobody asked the court to remove the constitutional two-thirds requirement.

The court ruled that the "substantive" right to education trumped the "procedural" two-thirds requirement of the Constitution. Under that sort of reasoning, the whole U.S. Constitution could be gutted by the claim that its "procedural" requirements gutted some "substantive" right or other.

[snopercod]

Good on you for actually reading the decision.

[goldstategop]

More like the SCOTUS could trump the Constitution's procedural safeguards on the grounds they were outweighed by more substantiative ends. What a scary thought.