Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear Meeting Could be Volatile
Omaha World Herald ^ | 7-17-03 | Robynn Tysver

Posted on 07/17/2003 10:18:27 AM PDT by Paraclete

Published Thursday
July 17, 2003

Nuclear meeting could be volatile

BY ROBYNN TYSVER

 

WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER

The nation's top nuclear scientists and experts will gather next month at Offutt Air Force Base to discuss the future of the nation's nuclear arsenal.

The Aug. 7 meeting has galvanized the region's anti-nuke community into action.

Leaders say at least 1,000 protesters are expected to descend on Omaha Aug. 1 to 3 to protest proposals to develop a new generation of nuclear weapons.

There will be speeches from four survivors of Hiroshima, a concert from independent rocker Michelle Shocked and a "peaceful" protest at Offutt.

Buses and vans are expected to come from Kansas, Des Moines and Minneapolis.

"We are framing this at least as a regional event, if not an international event," said Josh Cramer, a Lincoln peace activist who is organizing the event called "Speak Out at Stratcom."

The protest grew out of documents leaked last month that showed officials had been planning for almost a year a top-level meeting at Offutt, the home of the nation's nuclear command, to discuss possible new weapons, such as mini-nukes and neutron bombs.

The meeting was first revealed by the Los Alamos Study Group. The pro-disarmament group obtained minutes of a January meeting at the Pentagon that said Admiral James O. Ellis Jr., commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, would host the meeting.

Offutt is home of the Strategic Command, which oversees the nation's nuclear weapons on land, sea and in the air.

"It's the whole enchilada, this meeting. Anybody who is anybody in nuclear weapons will be there," said Greg Mello, a spokesman for the Study Group.

The U.S. Department of Defense confirmed the scheduled meeting, saying officials with the department and the National Nuclear Security Administration, scientists from the nation's two nuclear laboratories and other nuclear experts would be present.

"The purpose of the meeting is to discuss issues regarding the current status and future projections concerning the U.S. nuclear arsenal," a department statement said.

The meeting is significant in the context of the debate raging in the nuclear community, said Robert Nelson, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, which promotes studies on international affairs and publishes the Foreign Affairs journal.

There are some in the military and in President George W. Bush's administration who believe there is a need to develop new nuclear weapons, such a mini-nukes that, they argue, could be used to destroy underground bunkers and biological and chemical weapons.

They want options beyond the high-level nuclear weapons, Nelson said.

"There is a general belief that only through a strong and credible nuclear deterrent can we maintain our long-term security," Nelson said.

The Nuclear Weapons Council, made up of Defense and Energy Department officials, has ordered a three-year study of potential nuclear bunker busters.

However, the plan got a setback this week when a House committee eliminated much of the money sought by the Bush administration to research new nuclear weapons.

Officials with the National Nuclear Security Administration have promised to fight the proposed cut.

Opponents of nuclear proliferation argue that the development of new nuclear weapons will generate an arms race and obliterate the line between nuclear and conventional warfare. They say mini-nukes will be easier to use in small-scale wars such as Iraq.

"This is a very dangerous road to be going down, especially at a time when we're dealing with nonproliferation problems like North Korea and Iran," said Kathy Crandall of the British American Security Information Council.

"If this happens, we will be letting the nuclear genie out of the bottle," said Tim Rinne of Nebraskans for Peace, a major organization behind the three-day protest.

Groups involved in the three-day protest include Nebraskans for Peace, Nebraska Green Party, Lancaster County Democrats, ACT to Stop War Coalition and Central Nebraska Peace Workers.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrineunfold; offutt; usstrategiccommand

1 posted on 07/17/2003 10:18:28 AM PDT by Paraclete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paraclete
1000 protestors? Guess we better call the meeting off.
2 posted on 07/17/2003 10:21:48 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (If I can support FR with two kids in college, you can too. Freedom aint free but you can charge it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I'M BACK!!!

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com


STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD (It's in the Breaking News sidebar!)

3 posted on 07/17/2003 10:21:56 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paraclete
Bring a nuclear weapon into the base, that way ALL protestors can be shot on sight for trespassing.
4 posted on 07/17/2003 10:24:26 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paraclete
"we will be letting the nuclear genie out of the bottle," said Tim Rinne of Nebraskans for Peace"

Sorry Tim, the genie has been out of the bottle for a long time. Has this guy been asleep for the past 50 years?

5 posted on 07/17/2003 10:24:53 AM PDT by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: sd-joe
The Nebraskans For Peace and Tim Rinne in particular are grade A morons.
7 posted on 07/17/2003 10:45:26 AM PDT by activationproducts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paraclete; *Bush Doctrine Unfold; randita; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; okie01; socal_parrot; ...
So they support President Bush in Iraq?

Just asking!

Bush Doctrine Unfolds :

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below:
  click here >>> Bush Doctrine Unfold <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



8 posted on 07/17/2003 10:50:53 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and his Weapons of Mass Destruction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flurry
1000 protestors? Guess we better call the meeting off.

Isn't that the Republican way. If it gives seasoned citizens the free prescriptions or Teddy Kennedy the school money, etc why would this be any different.

9 posted on 07/17/2003 11:27:34 AM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Digger
Why would we create better ones? When Hillary gets in or her ilk, they will turn them over to the enemy for a song.
10 posted on 07/17/2003 11:28:58 AM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paraclete
USSTRACOM vs. peaceniks = Mutually Assured Detestation (MAD)
11 posted on 07/17/2003 11:35:42 AM PDT by Jonah Hex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson