Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dogbrain; VRWC_minion
Don't take this a defense of our boneheaded SCotUS, but the NAMBLA situation can be easily distingished from anti-Sodomy laws.

The pretext of striking down the anti-Sodomy laws was that it was two consenting ADULTS. Pedophilia involves children, who, by law, are too young to consent.

Of course, as the right to abortion (with or without parental notification) continues to expand, combined with all that "it takes a village" crap, it's only a matter of time before some court rules (a) children ARE consenting and (b) therefore child molestation is perfectly legal under the right to privacy.
28 posted on 07/17/2003 8:09:24 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Behind Liberal Lines
I'm not familiar with the exact wording of the ruling, but I would HOPE that the consenting parties would be specified as "adults", NOT "parties" or "persons".
29 posted on 07/17/2003 8:27:54 AM PDT by dogbrain ("Life is hard son. It's harder if you're stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
The guy isn't accused of pedophilia. He is accused of having a private membership in Nambla.

Your right about the age of consent which in some states is 14 and most 16. The laws banning sex between teachers and students are probably also unconstitutional so far as children over 16.

30 posted on 07/17/2003 9:11:26 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson