[johnb838]

Look, until and unless we find a quart of weaponized anthrax, or a VX tipped scud, the tRAiTorS will continue to screech: "No Evidence, No Evidence".

I was disappointed. I read about this interview earlier. I thought it meant they found something tangible.

[Republican Red]

Can't verify the validity of post and the poster is a newbie but...

From a thread I read on Monday:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/945443/posts

A close friend of mine has returned from Baghad and reports the presence hundreds of barrels of mustard and other constituents of WMD. He was sent specifically for his expertise in identifying them and flown this weekend for debriefing. Accusations of malfeasance levied against the president will soon become only so much rope...

37 posted on 07/13/2003 5:45 PM EDT by glaux [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

[prairiebreeze]

Some RATS will yell No Evidence even if a quart of anthrax is fed to them intravenously. David Kay is credible. Evidence of the programs will be enough for most IMO.

Prairie

[George W. Bush]

Look, until and unless we find a quart of weaponized anthrax, or a VX tipped scud, the tRAiTorS will continue to screech: "No Evidence, No Evidence".

You're right. We have to find some kind of WMD in credible amounts to shut up the critics.

Progress reports on Saddam's research won't mean much by the time the Dims/media get done with them. We have to have the actual product and in quantities to sufficient to demonstrate their danger to the West. I would say VX warheads in the dozens or enough uranium in some advanced stage of processing to eventually constitute a working nuke.

Documents alone aren't really enough. We have to have actual weapons to settle this.