Skip to comments.
Edward I. Koch: Dems, media are making an unforgivable mistake
Jewish World Review ^
| July 16, 2003
| Edward I. Koch
Posted on 07/16/2003 5:43:32 AM PDT by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-106 next last
To: carton253
Bumping back to Koch backing Bush:
The Democratic candidates for President -- and many in the media -- are trying to make President Bush seem like a liar. In so doing, they are making an unforgivable mistake.
To: cyncooper
It is unforgiveable because in trying to win an election, they are risking the war on terror.
A war that we must win.
62
posted on
07/16/2003 12:43:37 PM PDT
by
carton253
(You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
To: Happy2BMe
Dubya hasn't said a word...Bush Says Gay-Marriage Amendment May Be Unneeded President Says Marriage Only Means Man, Woman
POSTED: 12:24 p.m. EDT July 3, 2003
WASHINGTON -- President George W. Bush says a constitutional ban on gay marriage that's been proposed in the House may not be needed.
Bush told reporters Wednesday that lawyers are studying the ramifications of last week's Supreme Court ruling striking down state sodomy laws.
The president emphasized that he does support the "notion that marriage is between a man and a woman."
Supporters of a Federal Marriage Amendment to the Constitution say it's the only way to stop courts from requiring legalization of gay marriage.
But White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said it's unclear if the Supreme Court's sodomy ruling could be used to challenge the Defense of Marriage Act.
To: carton253
"Dubya is no coward on this issue." This is the only issue I would ever put the words "coward" and "Dubya" in the same sentence.
Ask some of the Log Cabin FReepers what Dubya says about homosexuality and get back with me.
64
posted on
07/16/2003 1:34:14 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
To: Happy2BMe
Steering thread back on topic after that unsubstantiated, off-topic garbage:
National Security Advisor, Dr. Condoleezza Rice, on Face the Nation over the weekend cleaned the clocks of her two media interrogators and critics, CBS' Bob Schieffer and Los Angeles Times Washington Bureau Chief, Doyle McManus with her brilliant responses to their questions.
65
posted on
07/16/2003 1:42:10 PM PDT
by
cyncooper
(it is my current intention to vote for George W. Bush for reelection...Ed Koch,7/16/03)
To: segis
*ping*
To: new cruelty
"POSTED: 12:24 p.m. EDT July 3, 2003 WASHINGTON -- President George W. Bush says a constitutional ban on gay marriage that's been proposed in the House may not be needed.
Bush told reporters Wednesday that lawyers are studying the ramifications of last week's Supreme Court ruling striking down state sodomy laws.
The president emphasized that he does support the "notion that marriage is between a man and a woman."
Supporters of a Federal Marriage Amendment to the Constitution say it's the only way to stop courts from requiring legalization of gay marriage.
But White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said it's unclear if the Supreme Court's sodomy ruling could be used to challenge the Defense of Marriage Act."
WEAK, WEAK, WEAK and WEAK.
Dubya has lost literally tens of thousands of supporters in the past 30 days over this WEAK, WEAK, WEAK posture.
He won't COMMIT - he is blowing it BIG TIME.
Facts is facts.
67
posted on
07/16/2003 1:46:05 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
To: Howlin
Ed Koch is a decent enough man- I can remeber when there were a fair number of Democrats like him- Pat Moynihan, Paul Tsongas, Sam Nunn.
68
posted on
07/16/2003 1:50:11 PM PDT
by
backhoe
(Just an old keyboard cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the sunset...)
To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping. Koch is one of the few Dems I ever respected.
69
posted on
07/16/2003 2:06:36 PM PDT
by
LisaFab
(Free Miguel Estrada!)
To: Happy2BMe
Koch bails out from supporting a democrat for president because he thinks W is the man for the job and at the same time you bail out from supporting W because your opinion that his exercising due diligence through studying DOMA is weak.
HA!
To: new cruelty
"HA!" Bush is riding the fence.
I've been voting now for over 30 years.
I may start calling him the "Fence Rider From Texas."
71
posted on
07/16/2003 3:32:20 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
To: SJackson
Ed Koch is right. President Bush didn't lie in his SOTU address about WMD. Koch has risen above the gutter politics of the partisan liberal establishment.
Kudo's to Ed Koch!
And go Bush go!
To: SJackson
I have no real problem with Mr. Bush disseminating misinformation in order to get public backing for Iraq Part II. That is what politicians do, and we should expect it.
My main bitch with him is that with all the real, solid, easily provable and proven reasons to invade Iraq, he had to fall back on the
Were All Gonna DIE!!! argument instead of the viable reasons.
Saddam needed to be kicked out of power. Maybe Mr. Bush was right to use scare tactics if he believes that is the only way to get support.
An American POW being held by Iraq is no reason to unleash the Dogs of War.
Saddams continual violations of the terms of the Iraq I cease fire note, cease fire, not Peace Treaty. His forces continually fired on allied aircraft enforcing the No Fly Zone that Iraq agreed to abide with. He refused to give full cooperation to the UN weapons inspectors as he agreed to do. I believe there were over a dozen UN resolutions he violated.
These reasons were deemed insufficient for Mr. Bush, and he barely mentioned them. He had to try to instill fear in the American People.
73
posted on
07/16/2003 4:57:23 PM PDT
by
R. Scott
To: MrConfettiMan
If Clinton wasn't impeached for lying to a grand jury... Clinton was impeached. But he wasn't removed...
74
posted on
07/16/2003 5:53:44 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
To: princess leah
Schumer has been rather quiet lately, hasn't he? Wonder when he's going to vomit his version of the Dims Talking Points?
75
posted on
07/16/2003 6:23:21 PM PDT
by
arasina
(I'm not sure if I really care for indecisive people. Maybe I do; maybe not.)
To: Happy2BMe
Go ahead and call him whatever you like. Vote for a Democrat or don't vote at all and cause a Democrat to win. Then you can look forward to even more sodomific decisions from the new SCOTUS Supremes Extremes.
76
posted on
07/16/2003 6:31:42 PM PDT
by
arasina
(Conservatives, be CONFIDENT! [My new fightin' words!] WE WILL PREVAIL!)
To: arasina
Go ahead and call him whatever you like. Vote for a Democrat or don't vote at all and cause a Democrat to win.Admit it or not, it is the same thing, isn't it?
77
posted on
07/16/2003 6:45:35 PM PDT
by
SJackson
To: SJackson
good read.
78
posted on
07/16/2003 6:50:38 PM PDT
by
jern
To: arasina
"Vote for a Democrat or don't vote at all and cause a Democrat to win." As I said, I've not waivered from the Republican ticket for over 30 years.
What we need is another one of these . . .
Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.
Dubya needs a clue.
79
posted on
07/16/2003 8:07:04 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
To: SJackson
Admit it or not, it is the same thing, isn't it? I don't think so, not by half. But I am interested in how you think it is.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson