Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fightin kentuckian
Teacher: Bauman

Pre-requisites/Comments: Social Science Senior Elective.

COURSE CONTENT: This course will examine how women's and men's sex and gender roles have been defined by society and, more specifically, we will explore how and why women are treated differently than men and what the benefits and/or consequences of that differential treatment may be. Gender roles will be studied through the following units: Types of Feminism, History of Feminism, Feminist Jurisprudence, Politics, Education, Work, Reproductive Rights, Images of Women and Men in the Media, Sexuality, Violence Against Women, and Moving Ahead/Affecting the Future.



This is suppose to be a Catholic school? They say the class is about reproductive rights? That is obvious code language for promoting abortion.
34 posted on 07/16/2003 7:02:40 AM PDT by ACAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ACAC
Jesuit Catholic. The Vanguard of the Revolution.
42 posted on 07/16/2003 7:46:51 AM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: ACAC
This is suppose to be a Catholic school? They say the class is about reproductive rights? That is obvious code language for promoting abortion.

I heard this woman interviewed last weekend. She was claiming that "many Catholics believe in choice" and said that she points out to her students that the reason the Catholic church is against so many forms of contraceptives is that they are actually early-acting abortifacients. (In other words, she tries to make her students think that there is no difference between taking the pill and having an abortion; that kind of tactic has been used by Planned Parenthood since the 70's as part of their pro-abortion propaganda.)

Most of what she said about this topic and about the Iraq war were typical liberal muddy utterances. Not a single thing she said was anything that a logical person would conclude upon reflection of the facts. The host (I don't know who he was) asked some pretty pointed questions, which she sidestepped by uttering more liberal mush. She became pretty defensive, a sure sign that she is perfectly aware that her position is not supportable by facts or logic.

96 posted on 07/16/2003 9:14:03 PM PDT by exDemMom (W in '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson