Skip to comments.
Arnold for governor would be powerful candidate
Sacramento Bee ^
| 7/14/03
| Daniel Weintraub
Posted on 07/15/2003 4:00:00 PM PDT by William McKinley
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:52:42 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
I don't know if Arnold Schwarzenegger will run for governor. But I do know this: Our standard-order politicians are dreaming if they think they are going to blow him away.
I'm not surprised that the general public sees Schwarzenegger, so far, as little more than a Hollywood celebrity. But the political class should know better. This is a man of substance with accomplishments in charity and business that would make him a very formidable candidate for the state's highest office, even if his lack of political experience makes it difficult to guess what kind of governor he would ultimately be.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ahnold; arnie; arnold; calgov2002; grayout; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Fred Barnes laughed off the description of 'pragmatic libertarian', and rightfully so. Actually, with the exception of the gun control and abortion issues he sounds pretty Whiggish.
To: All
Free Republic. More Bang For The Buck!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
07/15/2003 4:01:23 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: William McKinley
I'd rather have Tom McClintock, but it may take a "pragmatic libertarian" AND lots of charisma & show-biz know-how for any Republican, RINO or not, to get elected. I just don't see any other Republican right now who has that combination. So, to Gray Davis, I say: you soon may be hearing,
"Gett owwtt. Ah'll drive."
3
posted on
07/15/2003 4:02:49 PM PDT
by
pogo101
To: pogo101
If he gets elected... we all KNOW what the re-election slogan will be....
"I'll be back."
4
posted on
07/15/2003 4:04:08 PM PDT
by
Terabitten
(Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of All Who Threaten It)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
ping
To: William McKinley
We already have an anti-gun and pro-abortion governor, so considering what Arnold believes in which distinguishes him from the mainline Democrats, he'd be a tremendous improvement.
6
posted on
07/15/2003 4:05:31 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again.")
To: William McKinley
Arnold is the future of the California GOP. For a long, long time - someone has needed to throw us a life preserver- too often we got the opposite- a ballast, bad advice from Republicans outside California who don't understand the political realities of our state. Arnold is it. He has the life story, the charisma, the dynamism to pull it off. And his popularity will be a rising tide that lifts all boats- making it possible for even social conservatives to win other statewide offices in California. The last thing we need right now is for some out-of-staters or some purists who've led us down a rathole for the last 20 years to abandon the greatest chance we've had in decades.
To: William McKinley
If Schwarzenegger runs, Democrats won't be able to lay a finger on him with issues they've long used to demonize Republicans: abortion, gun control, gay rights, the environment. Could that be because Ahnold is pro-abortion, anti-2nd-Amendment, pro-homosexual agenda and pro-Spotted-Owl?
To: My2Cents
I agree he would be a tremendous improvement, and I unfortunately agree about the political landscape of California.
But there was an argument made to me by someone (darned if I can remember who though) that was pretty much along the lines of "a Republican governor with the current legislature is not going to be able to fix the mess California has right now, especially not in a shortened term. It would be better for Republicans, and for the state, if the Democrats ride this ship down a bit longer so that the public has no choice but to blame them."
I found that fairly convincing. I argued against him for a while, but the more I thought about it the more I started to suspect he may be right.
Is he?
9
posted on
07/15/2003 4:10:43 PM PDT
by
William McKinley
(The Democrat Party Appeals To The Midol Challenged)
To: Libertarianize the GOP; *calgov2002; PeoplesRep_of_LA; Canticle_of_Deborah; NormsRevenge; ...
This will drive some of us crazy worrying about his socially moderate stand!!
calgov2002:
10
posted on
07/15/2003 4:11:28 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
To: William McKinley
It formed the basis for his successful ballot initiative, Proposition 49, which will expand PUBLIC FUNDING for after-school programs. Just what a state with a 38 billion dollar deficit needs.
To: William McKinley
I must admit it'd be fun to have a recall election campaign shape up as essentially giving CA voters a choice between Davis and Schwarzenegger.
SO many sloganeering opportunities:
1. Gray Davis: GIRLY MAN
2. TOTAL RECALL (natch)
3. "Get. Out."
Any more? Help me out here. :)
12
posted on
07/15/2003 4:14:06 PM PDT
by
pogo101
To: pogo101
The budget deficit will be ERASED?
13
posted on
07/15/2003 4:15:02 PM PDT
by
William McKinley
(The Democrat Party Appeals To The Midol Challenged)
To: William McKinley
I think Arnold will be the next gove. That is just a guess. He is pretty centrist, maybe even left of center but it is a step in the right direction.
14
posted on
07/15/2003 4:16:54 PM PDT
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: My2Cents
We already have an anti-gun and pro-abortion governor, so considering what Arnold believes in which distinguishes him from the mainline Democrats, he'd be a tremendous improvement. Nope. Davis can't claim a leadership role INSIDE our party, but Arnold can. Pete Wilson heaped an untold amount of destruction on the GOP during the 90s with his attempt to remake the party in his own liberal image. We are still trying to recover from the damage he caused.
Arnold would be bad, bad news. McClinotck, yes, Simon, yes, Issa, yes (if he stays on the conservative path) I'd even support Bill Jones if he somehow became a viable option. One of them can rise to the top and I think one will. My guess is that before the actual election it will be apparent who is leading and all support will shift their way.
NO MORE LIBERAL REPS!!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!
15
posted on
07/15/2003 4:17:42 PM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
To: William McKinley
The budget deficit will be ERASED?
Heh, yeah ... hope so ... but not until at least THE SIXTH DAY, and hopefully before the END OF DAYS ...
Oh, wait! Just thought of another great line/moment from a movie, to be used in a campaign. Near the beginning of "Kindergarten Cop," Arnold's undercover cop character busts into a vice den with shotguns raised. Asked, Who are you??, he answers, just before blazing away with said guns,
AHH'M DA PAHTY POOPAH!
16
posted on
07/15/2003 4:21:03 PM PDT
by
pogo101
To: Texas Eagle
...And a nanny-stater, having campaigned for the essence of 24/7 public schools in CA's last statewide election.
17
posted on
07/15/2003 4:21:23 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: William McKinley
That case might have been made by "AngryClam." He has been compelling in his opinion that the recall is potentially dangerous.
I consider it potentially dangerous too. My attitude had been that the Democrats made the mess in this state, they should clean it up, and barring that, they should go down with the ship. But then I signed the recall petition. To me, I came to the conclusion that it's a message that politicans cannot ultimately get away with rampant corruption, issues aside.
I think the argument that a Republican governor alone will not be able to clean up the mess is correct. But an extraordinary person could have an impact. And in California, there is the line-item veto, which Reagan used to good effect when he was governor. I think the argument that a Republican governor will not help, but will only be the new target of the people's wrath when he fails to clean up the mess, has some merit. But that's really a cynical viewpoint; I still hold out hope that an extraordinary person can have an impact. Tom McClintock has the smarts to do a good job, and the courage to cut, slash, and burn. But he'd be savaged by the Democrats in the Legislature. Maybe Arnold's the guy who can have an impact.
18
posted on
07/15/2003 4:26:15 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again.")
To: ElkGroveDan
I'll acknowledge -- McClintock, yes; Issa, yes; Simon, maybe. But if it comes down to Arnold being the favorite, I'll take him over keeping Gray Davis in office. The biggest problems in California are fiscal, and Arnold appears to be enough of a fiscal conservative to be given a chance, if it comes down to him.
19
posted on
07/15/2003 4:29:21 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again.")
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson