You know it's not. It's just that none of those other perversions has its own well-funded advocacy group -- not to mention the time and inclination to actually work their way into the church power structures.
There is "Dignity" in the homosexual lifestyle that hangs out in public restrooms and parks looking for anonymous sex?
Hey, they picked the name, not me. It's just window dressing, of course.
That comment is what I was looking for. Now the big question is, why aren't adulterers, who outnumber the homosexuals, "working their way into the church power structures."? Could it be that just being confused about one's sexual function does not define homosexuality? Or is Paul right in Romans 1?