so all the non-religion based reasons that homosexuality is bad, unnatural, and unacceptable are sufficient to preclude the establishment of the cult of homosexuality. The "non-religion based reasons," which you decline to state, could probably be equally applied to heterosexual conduct.
You may want Uncle Sam peeping in your bedroom to make sure that you don't do anything too disruptive to the society's pristine social fabric, but I think my privacy is worth more than that.
I'll pass on the bedroom police, thanks anyway.
Let's agree on this, you stay out of my bedroom and I'll stay out of your church. The government can stay out of both. I think that's a fair enough solution.
Trace
I have never been one to cite religion with any specificity in this issue.
Consider that homosexuals are more likely to molest children.
Consider that homosexuals are seeking to special rights and special protections in society and in schools.
Consider that children raised by homsexuals are certain to have sexual problems as adults.
Consider that homosexuals are more prone to sexually transmitted diseases as a lifestyle
Consider that homosexuals are a behavior that many psychologists are considering a fetish. Not unlike BDSM or shoes or rubber or leather or any other method used to gain sexual arousal.
Consider that groups like GLSEN seek to replace parental moral authority with their own "sexual gratification" authority.
consider that children who are homosexually abused are more prone to end up focusing on a homosexual lifestlye unless they are recipients of counseling to prevent the resultant deviance.
Consider that society has a vested interest in ensuring that the marriage institution consiste of ONE mother/wife and ONE father/husband. Dan Quayle was right even more than he knew.