Skip to comments.
Frustrated Democrats complain of media bias (Sniff Sniff!)
Hill News ^
| 7/15/03
Posted on 07/15/2003 8:04:58 AM PDT by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Oh and what are they putting Bush thru now? The liberal media and the Democrees are focusing on one line in the state of the union speech ad nauseum.
To: All

See that good looking dude on the left? He's got FAR BETTER THINGS to do than conduct Freepathons! Come on, let's get this thing over with.
2
posted on
07/15/2003 8:07:22 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: areafiftyone
Bias *this*: TAG LINE CONTEST over here!
WINNER GETS A FREE COPY OF THIS (the book, not the girl, stupid)
3
posted on
07/15/2003 8:08:17 AM PDT
by
FreeTheHostages
(but please note the contest judge is drunk)
To: areafiftyone
The Democrats have nothing positive to say. I love their whining. Let em keep it up.
4
posted on
07/15/2003 8:08:32 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: areafiftyone
The rat media monopoly is over and they don't know what to do about it.
To: areafiftyone
Contrast the b*tching & crying over perceived bias on the part of the democrats with the taboo the GOP still has on discussing actual liberal media bias.
Makes me wanna slap the snot outta one of these bed-wetting whiners. Any one'll do.
6
posted on
07/15/2003 8:11:06 AM PDT
by
skeeter
(Fac ut vivas)
To: areafiftyone
This is breathtaking. I guess it's the natural result of outcome-based thinking. In other words, since Bush is not getting the same outcome as Clinton did, then the process must be biased. Never mind that it had anything to do with what was done in office! No! Once must focus entirely on the outcome!
Cry me a river...
To: areafiftyone
Ironically, they fall victim to thier own issue..because the beltway media bleats incessantly about the 16 words in the SOTU, the Dem think they're getting traction with this issue...well, they ain't..
8
posted on
07/15/2003 8:13:32 AM PDT
by
ken5050
To: areafiftyone
Good news! And good post!
To: goldstategop
Wah wah wah!
To: areafiftyone; Grampa Dave; glock rocks
Bump & Ping
11
posted on
07/15/2003 8:16:47 AM PDT
by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
To: areafiftyone
Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) said: I believe the press seems to have a different standard for Mr. Bush than for Mr. Clinton. Hmmmmm.....Lets See, Clinton Campained on a middle class tax cut, then rammed thru a democratic congress the largest tax increase inte history of man, also Clinton got caught in , shady land deals with a corrupt S&L partner, an endless stream of bimbo eruptions culminating in a public Rape accusal, COmitting what would be considered sexual harassment in the least in corporate america in the Oval Office, Perjury before a Federal Judge, Bombing an aspirin factory on the eve of impeachment on scantier evidence than the uranium, (actually NO evidence...), and pardoned terroists to help his wifes senatorial campaign.....
I would respectfully assert that the difference in coverage is directly linked to the difference in Behavior.
12
posted on
07/15/2003 8:18:41 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
To: areafiftyone
Well, for one thing the Dems have been hoist on their own petard with regard to the Campaign Finance Reform bill they were screaming for. For a long time now they've portrayed their party as in favor of the "little guy" and the Republicans as slaves to corporate interests, which is fine demagoguery but risky to actually believe, which they clearly did in passing the CFR bill. It turns out that the real weight of the "little guy" political donations was heavily toward the Republicans, not the Democrats, and their nominal solution for the image didn't address the reality. Too bad.
But I wouldn't be leaning too heavily on the "different standard" argument if I were they - were Bush to gather personal FBI information on 1000 leading Democrats under the auspices of the Homeland Security Act I suspect they wouldn't want it whitewashed as it was under their boy Clinton. As with the CFR bill, they ought to be careful what they ask for.
To: areafiftyone
Democratic strategists fear that by next July the national Republican fundraising committees will have raised close to twice as much as their Democratic counterparts. Well, looks like Campaign Finance Reform will have to be reformed again. Hehhehheh....
To: areafiftyone
The conservative talk show circuit is really got these morons flustered. And without the clout of controlling the WH press corps, their daily talking points are rebutted before the fax paper leaves the machine.
I'm deeply saddened. :-)
15
posted on
07/15/2003 8:20:01 AM PDT
by
JoeSixPack1
(POW/MIA - Bring 'em home, or send us back! Semper Fi)
To: areafiftyone
Clinton was an ass*ole, Bush is not. Maybe thats why the media is giving him the perceived pass..
16
posted on
07/15/2003 8:20:31 AM PDT
by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
To: areafiftyone
HUH??????
17
posted on
07/15/2003 8:20:35 AM PDT
by
Exit148
($45,89 from the Loose Change Club for the current Freepathon. Only $3.83/week.)
To: areafiftyone
Incredible!
It's mind-boggling that they can't figure out that Bush isn't "weathering the scandals" that plagued Klintoon because Bush doesn't behave in a scandalous fashion!
18
posted on
07/15/2003 8:21:38 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: areafiftyone
What funny, spiteful, dishonest little people they are...
19
posted on
07/15/2003 8:26:06 AM PDT
by
eureka!
(Rats and Presstitutes lie--they have to in order to survive.....)
To: areafiftyone
the Department of Homeland Security is broken and needs to be fixed.Geez...it has only been in existence since Jan 2003, you can't reorganize a complete Govt. system overnight. Also, it would probably be alot easier if those Departments did not have the added burden of responding to Democrat investigations over perceived wrongs that have no factual basis .
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson