Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boot Hill
That efficiency % is disingenous at best: the largest "loss" of energy is atmospheric absorption. I would argue that since solar power is only collected once it has already passed through the atmosphere, this "loss"
really isn't a loss at all.

Considering the necessary military expenditures for protecting our access to overseas crude, the pittance in subsidies allocated to solar power is miniscule.
91 posted on 07/15/2003 6:41:50 AM PDT by LN2Campy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LN2Campy
LN2Campy says:   "I would argue that since solar power is only collected once it has already passed through the atmosphere, this 'loss' really isn't a loss at all."

It doesn't alter any of the data in the table whether you start your calculation with the solar constant or after atmospheric effects. The numbers all remain the same.

--Boot Hill

104 posted on 07/15/2003 7:25:21 AM PDT by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson