To: Radioactive
>>Just say -- COAL.
I'd prefer to just say "nuclear fission". It releases a lot less radioactivity into the general environment, not to mention all the other pollutants. And it can be done very cost effectively.
55 posted on
07/15/2003 5:40:28 AM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
To: FreedomPoster
I'd prefer to just say "nuclear fission". Absolutely. There's no other option so clean & affordable. We just need to change the name to make it less scary... Perhaps "hug fission" or "JonBenet fission."
98 posted on
07/15/2003 7:00:05 AM PDT by
Sloth
("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson