Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DB
DB contends:   "You also show the plants capital expenses to build the plant but not the actual fuel costs over the life of the plant."

Incorrect, I covered that in the third paragraph of "Here is an example" and the interest costs of the very expensive solar power plants would exceed the actual fuel costs over the life of the plant. The interest costs of a 30 year, 10 billion dollar loan at 5.3% would be $9 billion dollars greater for a 1000 MW solar plant than for a conventional power plant. The cost of the natural gas for the conventional plant during that same 30 year period would be $8.9 billion dollars. This presumes $1/W for conventional and $10/W for solar. The real cost of a solar power plant would be greater than the $10/W figure I quoted and conventional plants are closer to $0.75/W.

--Boot Hill

42 posted on 07/15/2003 5:09:42 AM PDT by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Boot Hill
So you get them within hollering distance. That's actually better than I'd expect.
45 posted on 07/15/2003 5:14:06 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Boot Hill
So you're saying that natural gas costs are 3.4 cents a kilowatt-hour?

Why am I paying about 12+ cents a kilowatt-hour?
54 posted on 07/15/2003 5:40:20 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Boot Hill
The real cost of a solar power plant would be greater than the $10/W figure I quoted

Sorry, you are off by over a third. A solar power plant can be built for far less than that.

147 posted on 07/15/2003 9:09:54 PM PDT by kezekiel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson