To: Aric2000
And so you believe CNN, although widely discreted on nearly everything, somehow, got this one right? That's not a very scientific viewpoint. In fact, because such a statement stretches the boundaries of credibility, I'd say that your bias is showing.
48 posted on
07/15/2003 12:16:52 PM PDT by
=Intervention=
(White devils for Sharpton Central Florida chapter)
To: =Intervention=
Oops. Should be "discredited".
49 posted on
07/15/2003 12:23:46 PM PDT by
=Intervention=
(White devils for Sharpton Central Florida chapter)
To: =Intervention=
My Bias is showing, you seem to be the one claiming that ID is science, when in fact it is NOT.
The discovery institute is NOTHING more then a PR firm for ID, there is no scientific study going on, or they would not waste their money on marketing and publicity to school boards in every little podunk school board that they can try to get a grip on.
When they actually do some scientific study to try and show that ID can be used as a valid theory, then we will talk about it being taught in science.
86 posted on
07/15/2003 10:16:03 PM PDT by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson