[Jim Robinson]

Yes, I'm willing to pay whatever short-term price we have to pay to keep the Democrats out of power for another four and hopefully eight or tweleve years. As I've stated a thousand times it's the only way we can turnover the judiciary. If you let the Democrats have it back, we'll simply be adding more liberal activists to the bench and continue setting ourselves back decades at a time. The cycle has to be broken sooner or later. Might as well do it now while we have a popular Republican president and a majority in the Congress. We need to hang on to the presidency and continue building on the majority and continue replacing liberal judges with conservatives as the old libs retire or die off. We must also work to replace the Rinos with conservatives as we can (without losing the majority). We must also work in our local districts to move new conservative blood up the ladder. It can be done. Takes time, dedication and hard work. How else would you propose doing it?

[The Red Zone]

How else would you propose doing it?

lemme guess what he sez: darwin rules?

[hchutch]

The courts have to come first on the domestic front. We're literally at a point where, as Southack has said elsewhere, we need to decide just how far we are willing to go to get more importnad objectives accomplished.

[OWK]

The cycle has to be broken sooner or later. Might as well do it now while we have a popular Republican president and a majority in the Congress.

That's just the point.

By expressing a willingness to "pay any price", you end up perpetuating the cycle... not breaking it.