Do you have to win this badly?
I didn't continue to repeat it... when you went into attack mode, you used that statement to accuse me of things I wasn't saying. I defended myself against those attacks and those attacks only. I even said that I would have corrected the statement if you weren't too busy trying to win the game with a single swing of the bat.
Even now, you won't accept the win with any graciousness because it is more important to appear the injured poster and continue the attack. That must be because I'm still standing, and you have admitted that this is winner take all.
Even that is false. You said that Congress was to blame, not Bush - and I demonstrated that Bush shared in the blame by promoting these items and not using the power of his veto pen to block them. Pointing out the shortcomings of your argument is hardly accusing somone of saying things they weren't saying.
It's not that I have to win - it's that you refuse to be honest about your own misstatements. And, since you are showing no signs of altering that trait, I won't bother any further. You can distort the debate one more time and get the last word.