Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
And the GOP then turned around and massively increased spending.

The GOP did not. Some members of the GOP sided with Democrats to do so. But you'll notice that (most times), the vast majority of the GOP votes against the spending programs. How can the GOP and the Democrats be the same and most votes end up being about 55-45?

104 posted on 07/15/2003 6:48:59 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy
A GOP congress has to pass 'em.

A GOP prez has to sign 'em.

No pass, no sign, no spend.

106 posted on 07/15/2003 6:51:01 AM PDT by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
But you'll notice that (most times), the vast majority of the GOP votes against the spending programs.

Of course, Bush could have just vetoed the spending programs, but, considering that he proposed many of them, he's not about to do that, is he?

But, in a way, you've made a far more damning case against Bush in regards to fiscal conservatism. Every conservative has his or her breaking point regarding this nonsense. I've just about reached mine.

113 posted on 07/15/2003 6:54:26 AM PDT by dirtboy (Not enough words in FR taglines to adequately describe the dimensions of Hillary's thunderous thighs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson