[Dilbert56]

At some point, the Republicans need to ask about the Democrat candidates' approach here. Leadership would be convincing us they could better protect us. All the 'Rats have done is show they can nit-pick, and not very effectively. What would they do to the next Saddam Hussein? Go back through his speeches and discredit him?

[floriduh voter]

The DNC has one technique, scorched earth. It has become tiresome and very hypocritical of the dem leaders who supported the war in Iraq to criticize the leader of the free world when there is no merit as you call it, nit-picking.

Bob Graham has served on the Intelligence Committee for a long time. Maybe that committee needs a name change as Bob Graham accepts no accountability for his party, including Janet Reno. Clinton & Reno's failure to treat the first WTC attack as terrorism and just as a criminal act led to 9-11. The 1993 attack was a gigantic red flag. They could have also gotten UBL at various times. We must remember the intelligence failures when the democrats were in the White House and the majority in the Senate. I recommend Barbara Olson's last book, The Final Days about x-42 and HRC. She warned of the threat of terrorism in the first chapter.

The Bush Administration began the War on Terrorism and that's why Americans feel safer having Republican leadership.

The media is beating the drum of the State of the Union speech to the delight of the dems but it is much ado about nothing. The President did not lie, stretch the truth or anything. Doesn't President Bush have First Amendment Rights too?

Go, Dubya!