[ontos-on]

I am sorry if I am losing patiencce on this, but my post tried to make that clear. The point of my post was to exhibit that when the legislature passes the tax hike with the majority rather than the 2/3 requirement then AT THAT MOMENT, it is the LEGISLATURE that is diluting the lone legislator's vote.

The Court only issued an opinon and an Order. The dilution occurs only when the Legislature follows the order and dilutes the vote by passing the tax hike without the 2/3 majority required by the Nevada Constitution.

[ontos-on]

Of course, I am not saying that the present action in fedral court is moot because the assembly sought an injunction rather than follow the Order and pass the bill diluting the votes.

[ontos-on]

Of course, I am not saying that the present action in fedral court is moot because the assembly sought an injunction rather than follow the Order and pass the bill diluting the votes.

[Principled]

You can lose patience at your leisure. Clear posts alleviate that.

I know understand your point.