[research99]

But, where's a reference, to back up your claim that Simon had to go to court to counter baseless "Enron-type" charges made by "Davis minions" about him? (Those court cases were already in the works, and Simon did all Republicans a disservice by not disclosing their existence in advance of running; even the White House -- which donated millions of dollars from contributions from Bush visits -- complained about that!)

I've read the Simon case file; have you? If you read it, you might see for yourself that Simon's actions don't equate with his words. Information on reading that case file is located in this thread, and I suggest you follow up on it.

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

A reference... because we are blowing off that whole "you need to hear that Simon shouldn't run" tangent of your's? That's because you weren't wrong to ad hominem attack me obviously.

Is this Deja Vu all over again. You mentioned your claims about how great you are at reading court cases. I said the timing of the case closing during the election, (even though he wasn't even convicted), was beyond suspect.

I have not read whatever you are talking about. Perhaps if you would stop bragging about what you claim to have read twice, you would find the time to cite some website where you can demonstrate, or reference if you prefer, where "Simon's actions don't equate with his words."

Beyond that, stop wasting my time with your tangents. I mean settle down and think about what I actually SAID about Simon, look at my tagline for crying out loud, research99 are you this lazy or just that careless?