[cardinal4]

He's lost me... 3rd party next election.

So it doesnt bother you that your stance could pave the way for Hillary to get in?

[cardinal4]

People, I have reprimanded for being forceful on this issue, but we are treading in dangerous waters here. Threatening third party votes or for dems because of some of the liberal stances Bush has taken is a recipe for disaster. Again; I dont like porous borders, AWB, etc. But I dont want it on my conscience that my selfishness and petulance paved the way for Hillary to get elected. This what happened in 92. It is my firm belief, that the military and intelligence services will suffer horribly under Kerry or Hillary. It is also my firm belief that liberals like the Clintons, left the door wide open for 9/11. Please think long and hard about your desicion to vote for Hillary, Kerry, and third party. Can you imagine algore at the helm on 9/11?

[Kay Soze]

Sorry that sorry argument WILL NOT work for me.

I tell you what even if Hillary's way is pathed with her husband as VP and AL GORE as head of the cabinent - I will still not ever ever ever vote for Bush again!

I am a conservative first.

All Bush has done is what even Hillary could not accomplish: Make the government much much bigger and socialize health care.

[Lexington Green]

So it doesnt bother you that your stance could pave the way for Hillary to get in?

No. Neither major party supports the Constitution. Who you gonna vote for ? Hitler or Stalin?

[samm1148]

Oops here we go again with the 'well if you don't vote for Bush evil democrat ______ will get in'. At least with a democrat in the white house this runaway spending might've been opposed. Judicial appointments would've been held up albeit from the conservative side.

Bush again? Campaign finance reform, support of the assault weapons ban, prescription drug forced charities, the education bill with Uncle Ted Kennedy, and finally where is that damn uranium at? No thanks to a second Bush term, I'll cast a principled vote for a third party candidate.

[ought-six]

"So it doesnt bother you that your stance could pave the way for Hillary to get in?"

Not even those who now say they'll not vote for Bush in 2004 will throw their vote away if the Hildabeast is the Dem candidate. The one sure way of getting the "Bush lost me" folks to vote for him is if the Beast runs on the other side. No one will throw their vote away if by doing so means the Beast will have a shot at the White House.

[UncleDudley]

So it doesnt bother you that your stance could pave the way for Hillary to get in?

Things will have to get worse before they get better. Government was smaller when Klinton was in office. (That's no endorsement for the demokrats, just fact)

With those in the line-up, I recommend just voting on the local and state levels and not voting for anyone on the national level. Concentrate on putting true patriots in at the state level who will ignore the idiots in Washington.

I'm not voting for Bush or the demokrats come next election. It would be best if the Repubs found another candidate, like Ron Paul.