Skip to comments.
UN thinks British Iraq proof based on fakes-diplomat
Reuters ^
| 14 Jul 2003
| Louis Charbonneau
Posted on 07/14/2003 8:55:26 AM PDT by huck von finn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
.
To: All
She wants to look her best for her subjects.
|
>
|
Make a fashion statement. Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
07/14/2003 8:56:30 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: huck von finn
"I understand that it concerned the same group of documents and the same transaction," the diplomat told Reuters on condition on anonymity. Another diplomat said he thought Britain's other evidence came from French intelligence services.Why did the choose the title they did? I am SOOO_OOOO_OOOO tired of this story. There was no lie. This is a non-issue.
3
posted on
07/14/2003 9:01:48 AM PDT
by
eyespysomething
(The advertisement is the most truthful part of a newspaper - Thomas Jefferson)
To: huck von finn
U.N.=Ultimate Nonsense!!!! Nothing but a bunch of Socialists/Communists THUGS doing anything to try to be relevant once again. Until The U.N. Stops trying to shove Socialism/Communism down our throats, I will take them with
a grain of salt!!!!
4
posted on
07/14/2003 9:03:22 AM PDT
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: huck von finn
Let's see about British Intel. We sent a guy down there to check out the story. The Brits say they didn't even know he was there.
5
posted on
07/14/2003 9:06:31 AM PDT
by
ex-snook
(American jobs need BALANCED TRADE. We buy from you, you buy from us.)
To: huck von finn
Who made the forged documents, and WHY?
6
posted on
07/14/2003 9:08:54 AM PDT
by
Mark Felton
("Socialism is for the little people." -- E. Leet)
To: huck von finn
I still don't understand what the problem is. In the State of the Union address, Bush said:
"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." (emphasis added)
He doesn't assert "our intelligence" uncovered this. He doesn't even mention Niger. The Brits are still standing by their statements. What's the problem?
There is NONE...of course, that is what the demoMORONs are left with: petty accussations about something of NO substance. The only substance is that of which the media is allowing their co-conspirators on the left to prevail with.
7
posted on
07/14/2003 9:26:54 AM PDT
by
mattdono
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: Mark Felton
Don't know!
To: ex-snook
The whole British intel business is starting to look like a circus now!
To: mattdono
He doesn't assert "our intelligence" uncovered this. He doesn't even mention Niger. The Brits are still standing by their statements. What's the problem? The Brits said they have "other information" to back the Iraq/uranium claim. It now turns out that ALL of it might be based on forged documents.
To: eyespysomething
Something's wrong here because none of this makes any sense at all.
To: huck von finn
It now turns out that ALL of it might be based on forged documents.No it does not...Blair stated recently that the information WAS NOT from the forged documents and he stood by the intel. The UN is trying to stir up crap because Bush is snubbing them.
To: huck von finn
"Something's wrong here because none of this makes any sense at all."Just one of the many things that doesn't make sense is why should we should be going to war based on the Brit's intel anyway.
It's becomming more obvious that WMD, present or absent, had zilch to do with our war entry. Bad guys and WMD are all over the world. And we ain't about to start up the draft.
14
posted on
07/14/2003 10:48:01 AM PDT
by
ex-snook
(American jobs need BALANCED TRADE. We buy from you, you buy from us.)
To: ex-snook
And we ain't about to start up the draft Lord I hope not. But at the rate we're going...
To: huck von finn
The United Nations nuclear watchdog believes Britain's evidence on Iraq trying to import uranium from Africa is all based on forged documents, a diplomat close to the agency said on Monday.
This is ARF ARF ARF FUL!!!!!
16
posted on
07/14/2003 1:01:30 PM PDT
by
hflynn
To: huck von finn
SMOKING GUN? LOOKS LIKE A FRENCH ACTIVE MEASURE DESIGNED TO EMBARASS THE US IN THE UN DEBATE LEADING TO THE WAR.
To: All
18
posted on
07/14/2003 3:40:08 PM PDT
by
anglian
To: anglian
Louis Charbonneau, This guys name sounded french so I googled it."The French Connection" was a good movie.But this S--KS!
19
posted on
07/14/2003 5:25:59 PM PDT
by
anglian
To: huck von finn
The patterns are emerging: documentary evidence is forged, actual evidence is planted.
-PJ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson