Skip to comments.
Should alcoholics get liver transplants?
BBC ^
| Last Updated: Monday, 14 July, 2003, 11:14 GMT 12:14 UK
| By Richard Warry
Posted on 07/14/2003 8:36:39 AM PDT by Cinnamon Girl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
There does seem to be serious problems that sometimes arise with the various systems of organ transplant. And the more any hospital or country removes the guidance of religious ethics to help with moral decisions, the more there will be amoral actions taken.
To: All
C'mon, have some class...
|
>
|
Think Right. Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
07/14/2003 8:38:00 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Cinnamon Girl
See: Mickey Mantle..
3
posted on
07/14/2003 8:39:48 AM PDT
by
ken5050
To: Cinnamon Girl
Should alcoholics get liver transplants?
NO
4
posted on
07/14/2003 8:48:26 AM PDT
by
ALASKA
To: Cinnamon Girl
I've always been of the opinion that there shouldn't be an automatic disqualification for alcoholics. The article pretty well addresses the factors that should be weighed, i.e. evidence of commitment, etc. If we start disqualifying alcoholics
automatically, when do we start disqualifying fat people for hearts or reckless drivers for anything?
We'd be asking physicians to start making value judgements, and I think their focus should be on making their patients better.
5
posted on
07/14/2003 8:49:18 AM PDT
by
Mr. Bird
To: ken5050
Don't forget about "Papa" John Phillips and Larry Hagman too. As a person who's possibly going to need a liver transplant in 5 years from Hepatitis C contracted from a blood transfusion 30 years ago, I would prefer non-reformed alcoholics not be allowed a transplant unless it's donated by a family member. Alcohol is extremely bad for damaged livers, I stay away from all forms including mouthwashes that contain alcohol.
To: Cinnamon Girl
I have a good friend that had a serious drug problem in his youth and contracted hepatitis. He has since found God, got a college degree, got married, had a child and is living a decent, moral life. He is not eligible for a liver transplant because of the circumstances surrounding his disease, but he's OK with that and acknowledges that he made mistakes in his life and must pay for them.
7
posted on
07/14/2003 8:54:24 AM PDT
by
randog
(Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
To: Cinnamon Girl
This is the beauty of socialized medicine. Under the old rules, if a person had the money and could afford it then little was denied to them. With Socialized Medicine, it appears that icarcerated criminals have a chance at the head of the line before the "alcoholic" with the financial means, just because it is "unfair" that someone who abused their liver getting drunk should have one when this miserable looking person over there, by our means of reckoning, is more deserving.
Under the new rules, one needs to sign up with advocacy groups. Those who are obese and are heart attack candidates, should ban together and lobby the Powers That Be to remove any stigma that may prohibit them from getting that rationed care.
Homosexuals and drug addicts should ban together and plead the case that AIDS and hepatitis knows no demographic boundaries, and everyone should just ignore those lying statistics and fork over the free/subsidized health care.
I guess money still talks, just not at the hospital. If you want a particular medical treatment your money is much better spent on a politician.
8
posted on
07/14/2003 8:55:28 AM PDT
by
Dr Warmoose
(I just LOVE to rant.)
To: bigfootbob
Good luck to you, my friend...I wasn't aware of the two other cases you mentioned..
9
posted on
07/14/2003 8:55:28 AM PDT
by
ken5050
To: ALASKA
Who are you, and by what authority do you claim to have any say over another person's healthcare?
When you say that alcoholics should be denied liver transplants, then you are setting up a precedent that any private transaction needs to be approved by the Life Style Police - and it seems that you are bucking for the job as Chief.
10
posted on
07/14/2003 9:00:06 AM PDT
by
Dr Warmoose
(I just LOVE to rant.)
To: ALASKA
Why is it any of your (or anyone else's) business?
11
posted on
07/14/2003 9:03:47 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: Dr Warmoose
When you say that alcoholics should be denied liver transplants, then you are setting up a precedent that any private transaction needs to be approved by the Life Style Police Bingo! But don't think you will get much support for small unintrusive government around here.
12
posted on
07/14/2003 9:06:47 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: Protagoras
Since the families of organ donors don't get money for their love one's organ DONATION how is it a business transaction? Also, the families have no say in who gets the organ as far as I know.
To: Protagoras
Some people just like to live in judgement of others.
weighing my two cents on the matter, as a recovering alcoholic (14 years plus sober....thank God) I have seen people go out and make make major transformations in their lives by learning to live sober. It isn't easy and some people just never get it regardless of how much they try. Regardless though everyone is responsible for their own life and as such for those who continue to drink, they shouldn't be eligible for transplants until they have demonstrated the ability to stay off booze.
It's not a judgement issue rather a resource decision. Do we put an organ into someone who wants to live or put it into someone who's actions show that they don't respect their own life?
To: Cinnamon Girl
Since the families of organ donors don't get money for their love one's organ DONATION how is it a business transaction?Who said it was?
Also, the families have no say in who gets the organ as far as I know.
They should. And they should get paid if they want to.
15
posted on
07/14/2003 9:11:36 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: misterrob
they shouldn't be eligible for transplants until they have demonstrated the ability to stay off booze. Who says? Who should be making the decision?
It's not a judgement issue rather a resource decision.
If I want to give my organs to someone who's business is it other than mine?
Do we put an organ into someone who wants to live or put it into someone who's actions show that they don't respect their own life?
WE?
16
posted on
07/14/2003 9:16:10 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: misterrob
I like what you said. An alcoholic I know was only able to stop drinking when he was put on medication. I wonder if this guy could be helped in that way. Also, the comments in the article about "drinking is a social thing" may be part of the problem in this case. If he doesn't recognize his addiction, how can he commit to stop?
To: Cinnamon Girl
Should alcoholics get liver transplants? Not if they are still drinking.
18
posted on
07/14/2003 9:18:21 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
To: Protagoras
You are basing your comments on a theoretical practice. The way it is now, donors don't choose the recipients, and people who need a transplant are put on a waiting list.
To: Cinnamon Girl
Alcoholics should get liver transplants if they can afford them, and they've got a willing seller.The donor's estate should make the decision, and be compensated.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson