Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A Simple Soldier
I thought I'd read somewhere before the war that they'd argued about reducing grains to slow the round. Some thought it such a fast, small round that it wasn't doing any knockdown at all....just passing on through. I think my memory's correct on that, but I have no idea where I read it.
21 posted on 07/14/2003 5:06:05 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: xzins; A Simple Soldier
IIRC, in the 62-grain "penetrator" round, "SS 109" is the actual bullet, and "M855" is the U.S. designation for the round designed around it.

Your recollection of "such a fast, small round that it wasn't doing any knockdown at all....just passing on through" was a phenomenon reported by our troops in Somalia, as well as later in Afghanistan, where the adversaries were not "trained by Hollywood" to fall down when hit, and instead kept going until actually physically incapacitated (and aided by indigenous substances such as khat). The tunsten tip of these rounds, while effective on vehicles and covered targets, did have a tendency to simply drill a pencil-diameter hole through the bad guys.

In Afghanistan, the 77-grain ammunition has been put into service for the last year now, and has a much more severe wounding effect, as well as better terminal ballistics at longer ranges.


58 posted on 07/14/2003 8:31:26 AM PDT by Joe Brower ("An elected despotism is not the government we fought for." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson