Hehehe. You'd just dream bad dreams. Now, would I do that to you? Anyway, the question is moot, since I'm a great fan of the law.
Meaning what, specifically?
Meaning that without the law you'd have anarchy - which is probably desirable for you, given your nick. However, it would mean that you'd be prey to whoever might want your property, whoever didn't like you, or whoever might just be crazy. Life in those conditions, according to historians, was "nasty, brutish and short". Kinda like in muslim societies, in fact.
You fancy yourself the master of the veiled and ambiguous threat. You like to lay it out there and the play dumb when called on it. The problem is, it is so transparent it only demonstrates your immaturity and the undercurrent of impotence that yearns for the ability to hurt people.
Meaning that without the law you'd have anarchy - which is probably desirable for you, given your nick. However, it would mean that you'd be prey to whoever might want your property, whoever didn't like you, or whoever might just be crazy. Life in those conditions, according to historians, was "nasty, brutish and short". Kinda like in muslim societies, in fact.
Attack anarchy all you like. Heck, attack my handle if you like, too. It just further confirms your lack of maturity. All that bravado and you can't even get it pointed in the right direction. Oh, and I like the shot at muslims. That's rich. Puts you right up there with the other racist. R9etb. Good going. Have you any more pre-pubescent gems to throw out?