Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldEagle
I like the idea of an M14 or two in a squad.

It's a bad idea logistically. Much better to just configure an M16 for longer range use; the military .223 has about the same effective range as a military .308 out of a given barrel length, but the rifles they are using aren't configured for it. With a different selection of ammunition, a 20" barrel will keep .223 accurate and supersonic past 1000 yards.

I'd say forget the M14 -- too expensive -- and just put a suitable optic on some 20" M16 upper. That will give you all the accuracy and lethality you need out past 800 meters or so, and with minimal logistical overhead or cost.

57 posted on 07/13/2003 5:49:28 PM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: tortoise
Marines have a 'deticated marksman' or two per platoon, I believe.

The use recycled Army M14 sniper rifles -rebarrled- and some high end optics, cost effective firepower.....
60 posted on 07/13/2003 6:06:12 PM PDT by ASOC (pistol is good, shotgun is better, but you just cant beat a ground radio/B52 combo sandwich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: tortoise
You may very well be correct. Bad logistically and expensive?? We already have the M14's and the ammo isn't hard to find, but you still might be right. I sure don't know.
61 posted on 07/13/2003 6:10:34 PM PDT by OldEagle (Haven't been wrong since 1947.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson