Replies

>>"More men would get married, if women forced us too. If the only way to have sex with women was through marriage, then by gum, I guess I would just have to do it, would'nt I?"<<

Hey, this sounds somewhat familiar! I seem to recall that this is the way it used to be (although I might want to discuss the word "force"). There was a time when society frowned upon (to put it mildly) men and women having sex before marriage and I think it was because our elders understood that sex is the least of the considerations for a good marriage -- even in the best of marriages, people talk and eat and keep house and travel and raise children and help parents and deal with life, etc., way more than they engage in sex! Liberals point to those ancient days as repressive for women and as marriage being designed by big bad white men (rather than by God and for our own good, no less). You can thank the feminists for getting women to think in unbiblical ways -- i.e. that home and family are not fulfilling; that men are the oppressors; that women should conduct themselves as men do in the sexual arena rather than uphold the sexual morals of our society (as they traditionally have). Of course, there have always been and always will be men who have bad intentions, but I hate the feminists for what they've wrought between us.

>>"You got me cold on the fornication deal."<<

Only a real man would admit it so freely.

>>"I can only say to God "She started it", and hope for forgiveness."<<

Nice try, but I suspect God is going to ask you about what YOU did. God offers us forgiveness, but I think there might be some questions about our sincerity if we continue to do things we know are sinful.

Call me DUH, but I still don't get why y'all call yourselves pukin dogs (I think you should have kept the "pukin" part -- it certainly is colorful!). But I do apologize for being so flip about it as I see that it is indeed honorable.

*<:o\