Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw
you have mischaracterized my remarks egregiously

Tit-for-tat threads are the bane of on-line forums, and I refuse to get sucked into one. I will point to notes 228 and 240, say that I consider both to have been general-purpose slurs on corporaions-in-general, and end my participation on the subject of why I chopped up your stuff.

270 posted on 07/16/2003 10:55:11 AM PDT by Nick Danger (The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]


To: Nick Danger
They were not. Private corporations, with protection from over scrutiny of the government but a high sense of fiduciary duty maintained by the courts of equity are a fundamental necessity. My point is that publicly traded corporations are by and large irresponsible, absent any significant sense of fiduiciary duty, have lost the legacy of how to be responsible, and are becoming wards and ESTATES of the state by means of overly intrusive regulation and reporting requirements. I believe it is exceedingly difficult to find books of such public stock companies that are not in many siginifcant ways, fantasy.

While the stock market and mutual stock funds are a great pride and money belt to so many, I fear it is a sham of the biggest sort. Bondholders come first. What is not bankrupted will be left alive on the drip for the delight of the Federal fascists.

272 posted on 07/16/2003 11:28:52 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson