That being said, If Rush Limbaugh wasn't driven by his wallet, he would be calling for people to get involved in the process by calling our represenatives or writing them, instead he stirs the pot and if it stirred enough, we get divided and what happened in 1992 will happen again.
We can not afford another Bill Clinton, if it means puting up with a republican President who caters to the middle to get re-elected I'm all for it just as long as he nominates conservatives to the Judiciary and impliments conservative policies for which has control of. George W. Bush is far more conservative than his father when it comes to foriegn policy, he is politically motivated on domestic issues, and must be in order to get re-elected. I feel as long as he is slowly changing the direction of the country while doing so, I'm all for it. Anything else will bring us another Bill Clinton at this time in our history
Right on. Some of the so called conservatives on this forum who are threatening to vote third party or for a dim, will be soleley responsible when Hillary or Kerry is elected. Then these so called conservatives will spend the duration of their tenure trashing them like they did Clinton. Oblivious to the fact that they put them in in the first place. It should also be noted that Ross Perot garnered some of Bushes votes. How many of the current whiners voted third party or not at all in 92, thus ushering in the Clinton era?
"Bush didnt do exactly what I and Rush wanted him to do so Im voting third party, Dim or not at all, that'll show Bush!" Sheesh. My 2 and 4 year old are more mature than that.