Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Armed forces chief says French troops to Iraq not on agenda
AP via NJ.com ^ | 7/12/03 11:33 PM | The Associated Press

Posted on 07/12/2003 9:32:50 PM PDT by Jean S

Edited on 07/06/2004 6:39:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

PARIS (AP) -- France could spare some 5,000 soldiers for an operation in Iraq but has received no orders to prepare for such a mission, the chief of the country's armed forces suggested in an interview made available Saturday.

Gen. Henri Bentegeat was referring Washington's request for soldiers to help stabilize Iraq. U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said last week that the United States "would be happy to have troops from a wide variety of countries, including France."


(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: france; iraq; peacekeepers; rebuildingiraq; stabilizationforce; unitednations

1 posted on 07/12/2003 9:32:50 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Funny ... I would have thought the Frenchies would want to get into Iraq as fast as they could.

It was their colony and protectorate after all.

Also a good chance to destroy any evidence that the US/British forces may find implicating the Frenchies directly to the creation of WMDs and possibly even hiding them now. Hmmmmmm?
2 posted on 07/12/2003 9:48:33 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
LOOK! Another Freeper Just Gave To The Cause! WAY TO GO!
We Salute Free Republic's Donors! Be one! Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 07/12/2003 9:49:45 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Meanwhile, x42 is in London pushing for NATO involvement in Iraq. Will France obey the wishes of their comrade Clinton?
______________
NATO should intervene in Iraq: Clinton

LONDON (AFP) Jul 12, 2003
NATO and European states should step forward to take part in rebuilding Iraq to internationalise the reconstruction process, former US president Bill Clinton urged at the "progressive governance" conference near London. "I was trying to think about some way the international community could come back together in the fight against terror.

"Europe should take the lead, the Iraq nation-building process should be internationalised. NATO should offer to go in. That will give United States a continued big position there," Clinton told the centre-left political gathering. [Does anyone else think he's speaking at about a 12-year-old level of intelligence here?]

The former leader appealed to the United States and nations involved in restoring peace to Afghanistan to double or triple their forces there to support President Hamid Karzai and prevent a return of the radical Islamic Taliban regime ousted by US forces in 2001. "The poor Mister Karzai is the president in Kabul with al-Qaeda and the Taliban coming back," he said.

But Clinton warned that the greatest threat came from North Korea, due to its development of nuclear weapons.

"(North Korea) was a far bigger threat than Iraq ever was. (...) They're not going to use them (nuclear weapons), they are going to sell them (...) to eat and stay warm and to be important," Clinton predicted.

"I think this is a very major deal, much bigger than is being presented in the press, and it requires urgent action."

Clinton called on the United States to work together with China, Russia, Japan and South Korea to find a solution to the escalating problem. "But what we really need is for the United Nations (...) to support this and to be able to help fund it," Clinton added.

"It's not a lot of money by the standards of what we're spending every month in Iraq -- it's peanuts -- and it could save the world one hell of a lot of trouble and a lot of lives."

Clinton, a Democrat, criticised the right-wing Republican administration that took over the White House after his mandate ended in 2001. "We are not dealing with an old right in the United States, we are dealing with a new right, with radical changes. (...) Their first value is power and control."[Unlike the Clintons, of course]

"We live in an independent world where it is impossible, even for the United States, to kill or occupy all our adversaries or potential adversaries," the former president said.

Clinton was speaking at the "progressive governance" conference of some 400 think-tank analysts and centre-left leaders from 14 nations. The conference aimed to give a boost to the "third way" that informed the politics of the centre-left in the 1990s. source

4 posted on 07/13/2003 7:04:27 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
That there won't be any French troops in Iraq is marvelous news for the Iraqis!
5 posted on 07/13/2003 9:34:16 AM PDT by WaterDragon (America the beautiful, I love this nation of immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson