didn't read the whole article- saw the part about the Dragunov, and then the bit about the troop capped by a "walk" by. from that amount of reading, didn't think it pointed at one guy.
Well, not all the killings. And I'm not agitating for that. But at least two sounded eerily similar. Those two could've been done by the same guy. If you were an insurgent commander, would it not make sense to use the guy as propaganda material? He's "made his bones" so to speak. This is only suspicion on my part. It will probably turn out not to be the case. But should we rule that out? Should we not turn resources on this the same as we would on the "Beltway Sniper" for instance?