To: Cacophonous; Pukin Dog
So that's going to be your response to Dems? ...I think President Bush better have a different response handy. Pukin Dog, I guess none of W's responses thus far are sufficient for the dems or Cacophonous.
To: new cruelty; Pukin Dog
My point is, the Bush administration used the existince of WMD as justification for going to war, even had his Secretary of State give an address to Congress citing the evidence. For this reason, and based on this evidence, he committed American troops.
If he now says he was waiting until he had rock-solid evidence (checking, re-checking and checking again) until he released his evidence, you all KNOW that whatever Dem du jour is in first place in the Democrat party, assisted by all the mainstream media, will ask why he committed American troops without rock-solid evidence.
So while it may be easier to advise those questioners to get their heads out of their asses, and while it may get giggles from fraternity boys and high school sophomores, it doesn't answer the question.
To: new cruelty
Bush does not have to respond at all. Not to the Dems, nor to the Media. They can scream all they want, they have NO real power. Anytime Bush wants, he can steal every headline in America. The Media HATES Bush, because he does not jump, when they start screaming.
Freepers are too used to the way that Clinton responded to every little blip in the media, to every poll and focus group. Bush is not a finger in the wind President. It would help also for Freepers to remember that maybe 1 American in 1000 is keeping up with this story on the web or the Cable news networks. Anyone stupid enough to get their news from CBS, NBC, CNN, ABC or CBS is not on our side anyway.
So relax, people.
50 posted on
07/12/2003 12:06:56 PM PDT by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
bttt
135 posted on
07/12/2003 1:17:57 PM PDT by
Kudsman
(LETS GET IT ON!!! The price of freedom is vigilance. Tyranny is free of charge.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson