Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prodigal Son
Oh it's been de facto policy, but not official policy. Important distinction.
162 posted on 07/12/2003 1:38:41 PM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: Cacophonous
Oh it's been de facto policy, but not official policy. Important distinction.

Well that's fair enough. If we want to get into semantics. The sun doesn't rise until officially announced? I don't mean to be sarcastic, but our policy in Iraq hasn't been exactly super top secret or anything. It matters not whether Congress passes an "Official Act" and reads Saddam the riot act before the news cameras. Our policy has been fairly overt to all but the willfully blind.

Call it what you will, this has been our policy whether one acknowledges it or not. Congress authorizes the funds and the President commands the troops. Both those branches have been involved with this policy for years and years. That's the way it is. Saddam is gone. That was inevitable. It's silly to quibble. This isn't a courtroom where either of us are looking for some "letter of the law" loophole to wriggle free with.

171 posted on 07/12/2003 1:47:07 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson