Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush may be sitting on Iraqi WMD evidence, FOX analyst says
Jerusalem Post ^ | Jul. 10, 2003 | Erik Schechter

Posted on 07/12/2003 11:27:50 AM PDT by yonif

The Bush administration may already have hard evidence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction that it is not sharing with the public, said Lt.-Gen. (ret.) Thomas McInerney, a military commentator for Fox News.

"The administration is willing to take the heat for now," McInerney yesterday told The Jerusalem Post, "then release the information next August." Doing so would put the Democrats who have been critical of the US president's policy on Iraq at a distinct disadvange in the run-up to the presidential election in November 2004.

Along with TV military commentators Maj.-Gen. (ret.) Paul Vallely and Col. (ret.) Jack Jacobs, McInerney came to Israel on Tuesday for a six-day study mission. The program was organized by the Foreign Ministry, the IDF Spokesman's Office, and the America-Israel Friendship League.

On Wednesday, the three commentators met with Deputy Defense Minister Ze'ev Boim. They are also scheduled to meet top IDF brass and tour the separation fence the goverment is building along the West Bank.

When the evidence of WMDs finally sees light, McInerney predicted that a number of countries, including France and Germany, will finds themselves in an uncomfortable diplomatic position.

"We know that these WMDs traveled through Syria," he said. "We know that a lot of these scientists had French passports."

A year before the Bush Administration planned for war in Iraq, McInerney and fellow Fox News analyst Vallely correctly predicted that the invasion would be an air-centered, technologically networked "war of liberation" that would last less than 30 days.

Both were critical of other ex-military officers such as former Army general Wesley Clark, who is now running for the Democratic presidential nomination who, they say, let political opinions paint a dire picture of the war.

"The credibility of CNN went way down," said Vallely.

Journalists traveling with soldiers were not the problem. McInerney said that, when properly used, embedded reporters proved of great value to commentators back in TV news studios.

"The embeds viewed the war through a straw," said McInerney, "but if you gathered up three or four of those straws, you got a general picture of what was going on."

But if one fails to pool together accounts from embedded reporters, the result is stories of a slowdown in the advance on Baghdad and a shortage of ammunition, neither of which happened. McInerney, Vallely, and Jacobs believe that negative coverage of the occupation stems from liberal circles disappointed with the success of the war.

"You have to remember that there's still leftover irritation from the election," said Jacobs, a Medal of Honor recepient and commentator for NBC. "If George Bush came out in favor of worldwide democracy, they would be against it."

Despite Wednesday night's killing of two American soldiers, one near Tikrit and the other near Baghad, Vallely said the occupation "is not going badly."

He notes buses are running, and students have gone back to school. In addition, oil is flowing, and the electrical and water utilities are being restored.

Nevertheless, all three men contend that an Iraqi interim government should have been established before the invasion a position long-advanced by the US Defense Department.

"But the CIA and State Department argued that you first have to get in-country and identify the players," said McInerney.

That Iraqi resistance exists at all, said Jacobs, is due to the rapid collapse of Saddam Hussein's army during the war. Coalition forces simply did not have the opportunity to hammer all his troops. "We are victims of our own success," he said. Jacobs went on to chide the Bush Administration for showing "insufficient ruthlessness" in rooting out pro-Saddam partisans hiding in the "Sunni triangle" of Tikrit, Baghdad, and Fallujah. Private arms held by the population must be confiscated with greater alacrity.

"It is inconceviable that you have people at a funeral shooting their AK-47s in the air," he said.

Vallely warned that Iraq is just one campaign in a larger American war against terrorism. "The next campaign may be against North Korea, Iran, or Syria," he said.

Commenting on Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, McInerney argued that the US-sponsored road map is a positive development but only as a first step.

"Hope isn't a strategy," the ex-USAF officer said. "You still have to go after the terrorists."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; fox; iraq; us; war; weapons; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-255 next last
To: new cruelty; Pukin Dog
My point is, the Bush administration used the existince of WMD as justification for going to war, even had his Secretary of State give an address to Congress citing the evidence. For this reason, and based on this evidence, he committed American troops.

If he now says he was waiting until he had rock-solid evidence (checking, re-checking and checking again) until he released his evidence, you all KNOW that whatever Dem du jour is in first place in the Democrat party, assisted by all the mainstream media, will ask why he committed American troops without rock-solid evidence.

So while it may be easier to advise those questioners to get their heads out of their asses, and while it may get giggles from fraternity boys and high school sophomores, it doesn't answer the question.

41 posted on 07/12/2003 11:59:52 AM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Of course they aren't going to wait until next August, I believe all the liberals who have been sqauking like injured ducks over everything this administration has been doing since day one, will once again have egg on their faces after Tony Blair and George W. Bush address a joint Session of Congress next week

Matter of fact, I think it will be an omelet this time

42 posted on 07/12/2003 12:00:22 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
What was he waiting for?
43 posted on 07/12/2003 12:00:26 PM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Schakaljager
It wont be next August, it may actually be next week with Bush and Blair together at the White House. It really doesnt matter when they do it, because they have the Dems on record now with quotes from each of the Presidential candidates.

One thing Freepers need to understand, is that neither the media or the Dems matter a whit. The only thing that matters is how the public feels about Bush a year from November. Bush is wise to never engage in a pissing match with Democrats. He does his thing and ignores the media, which hate him for it.

The media will be unable to keep this current thing going without participation from Bush, and they are not going to get it. That is why they are trying to raise such a loud stink, because they want to try to get Bush off message.

Bush is not Nixon. He will not panic, nor will he pay any attention to what is going on in the Media. That is Karl Rove's job, and he does it better than anyone.
44 posted on 07/12/2003 12:01:25 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Consort
It's further evidence I'm a lousy typist...
45 posted on 07/12/2003 12:02:47 PM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Bush can argue that they wanted to be totally accurate and complete with their WMD report. Therefore they checked, rechecked and checked again, before releasing the information. The Dems can scream all they want, they will be slaughtered.

I agree. They have been criticizing him for jumping the gun. How could they also criticize him for cautiously rechecking before making an announcement? Of course, we know they will try to hang him on it, but the noose will be on their own necks.

46 posted on 07/12/2003 12:04:09 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Bush can argue that they wanted to be totally accurate and complete with their WMD report. Therefore they checked, rechecked and checked again, before releasing the information. The Dems can scream all they want, they will be slaughtered.

Absolutely. Look what happens when one line from the SOTU speech isn't 100% verifiable. a full week of 'rats calling Dubya a "liar" and nearly demanding his impeechment.

Dubya better make sure any evidence of WMD is 100% accurate. If that means he needs to hold off announcing we found them until mid summer next year I sure won't blaim him.

47 posted on 07/12/2003 12:04:18 PM PDT by Once-Ler (I vote Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
George W. Bush plays Chess while the democrats and the liberal media are playing checkers
48 posted on 07/12/2003 12:04:29 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: yonif

"If they're fer it, then I'm agin' it!" is about how far their principles go, it seems.

49 posted on 07/12/2003 12:05:51 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Bush does not have to respond at all. Not to the Dems, nor to the Media. They can scream all they want, they have NO real power. Anytime Bush wants, he can steal every headline in America. The Media HATES Bush, because he does not jump, when they start screaming.

Freepers are too used to the way that Clinton responded to every little blip in the media, to every poll and focus group. Bush is not a finger in the wind President. It would help also for Freepers to remember that maybe 1 American in 1000 is keeping up with this story on the web or the Cable news networks. Anyone stupid enough to get their news from CBS, NBC, CNN, ABC or CBS is not on our side anyway.

So relax, people.
50 posted on 07/12/2003 12:06:56 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: yonif

51 posted on 07/12/2003 12:07:11 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
I agree with you WPhile, with one caveat. I wouldn't want endanger anyone if release of info was done too soon.

I have complete confidence in GWB. He hasn't given me any reason to lose faith in his honesty.
52 posted on 07/12/2003 12:07:25 PM PDT by baseballmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
is Bush addressing the nation next week?
53 posted on 07/12/2003 12:08:33 PM PDT by votelife (Free Bill Pryor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Bush can argue that they wanted to be totally accurate and complete with their WMD report. Therefore they checked, rechecked and checked again, before releasing the information. The Dems can scream all they want, they will be slaughtered.

I don't disagree .. but to wait till next August?

I don't think they'll wait that long

54 posted on 07/12/2003 12:09:13 PM PDT by Mo1 (Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cacophonous
My point is, the Bush administration used the existince of WMD as justification for going to war

So what?

Who in their right mind is going to suggest that we would be better off with Saddam still in charge over there? Bush can say that anyone making that argument is in favor of mass graves, oil money spent on weapons instead of food, and threats against Isreal and other neighboring countries.

Fine, bring that on. I can see Bush's knees quivering over that, for sure.

55 posted on 07/12/2003 12:10:24 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
That's a better tactic - just ignoring the media - than giving them ammo (ie, the implication he sent American troops into Iraq with less than perfect evidence). I've long been frustrated at the way the right would castate itself to the media, hoping to either calm them down or win their approval. Neither is going to happen, so to hell with them.
56 posted on 07/12/2003 12:10:50 PM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: AHerald
Huh? When did Clark enter the race?

I think he has a committee looking into whether to jump into the race

I don't think he has filed any papers for being a canidate as of yet

57 posted on 07/12/2003 12:10:58 PM PDT by Mo1 (Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
If you want to give ammo to the left, be my guest.
58 posted on 07/12/2003 12:11:58 PM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Cacophonous
When your opponent tends to shoot themselves in the head, why not give them the ammo to do so?
59 posted on 07/12/2003 12:13:14 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
If the data is in hand, the right strategy is to release something partial in a few weeks. Something highly suggestive and perhaps a gun, but not quite a smoking gun. Allow the Dems to have some wiggle room so that they can continue to dwell on it.

Then the correct day for the release of the entire package of data is the very night the Democratic nominee gives his nomination acceptance speech at their convention. It might actually cause some of the networks to break into the speech to announce the news.

60 posted on 07/12/2003 12:15:06 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-255 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson