Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush may be sitting on Iraqi WMD evidence, FOX analyst says
Jerusalem Post ^ | Jul. 10, 2003 | Erik Schechter

Posted on 07/12/2003 11:27:50 AM PDT by yonif

The Bush administration may already have hard evidence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction that it is not sharing with the public, said Lt.-Gen. (ret.) Thomas McInerney, a military commentator for Fox News.

"The administration is willing to take the heat for now," McInerney yesterday told The Jerusalem Post, "then release the information next August." Doing so would put the Democrats who have been critical of the US president's policy on Iraq at a distinct disadvange in the run-up to the presidential election in November 2004.

Along with TV military commentators Maj.-Gen. (ret.) Paul Vallely and Col. (ret.) Jack Jacobs, McInerney came to Israel on Tuesday for a six-day study mission. The program was organized by the Foreign Ministry, the IDF Spokesman's Office, and the America-Israel Friendship League.

On Wednesday, the three commentators met with Deputy Defense Minister Ze'ev Boim. They are also scheduled to meet top IDF brass and tour the separation fence the goverment is building along the West Bank.

When the evidence of WMDs finally sees light, McInerney predicted that a number of countries, including France and Germany, will finds themselves in an uncomfortable diplomatic position.

"We know that these WMDs traveled through Syria," he said. "We know that a lot of these scientists had French passports."

A year before the Bush Administration planned for war in Iraq, McInerney and fellow Fox News analyst Vallely correctly predicted that the invasion would be an air-centered, technologically networked "war of liberation" that would last less than 30 days.

Both were critical of other ex-military officers such as former Army general Wesley Clark, who is now running for the Democratic presidential nomination who, they say, let political opinions paint a dire picture of the war.

"The credibility of CNN went way down," said Vallely.

Journalists traveling with soldiers were not the problem. McInerney said that, when properly used, embedded reporters proved of great value to commentators back in TV news studios.

"The embeds viewed the war through a straw," said McInerney, "but if you gathered up three or four of those straws, you got a general picture of what was going on."

But if one fails to pool together accounts from embedded reporters, the result is stories of a slowdown in the advance on Baghdad and a shortage of ammunition, neither of which happened. McInerney, Vallely, and Jacobs believe that negative coverage of the occupation stems from liberal circles disappointed with the success of the war.

"You have to remember that there's still leftover irritation from the election," said Jacobs, a Medal of Honor recepient and commentator for NBC. "If George Bush came out in favor of worldwide democracy, they would be against it."

Despite Wednesday night's killing of two American soldiers, one near Tikrit and the other near Baghad, Vallely said the occupation "is not going badly."

He notes buses are running, and students have gone back to school. In addition, oil is flowing, and the electrical and water utilities are being restored.

Nevertheless, all three men contend that an Iraqi interim government should have been established before the invasion a position long-advanced by the US Defense Department.

"But the CIA and State Department argued that you first have to get in-country and identify the players," said McInerney.

That Iraqi resistance exists at all, said Jacobs, is due to the rapid collapse of Saddam Hussein's army during the war. Coalition forces simply did not have the opportunity to hammer all his troops. "We are victims of our own success," he said. Jacobs went on to chide the Bush Administration for showing "insufficient ruthlessness" in rooting out pro-Saddam partisans hiding in the "Sunni triangle" of Tikrit, Baghdad, and Fallujah. Private arms held by the population must be confiscated with greater alacrity.

"It is inconceviable that you have people at a funeral shooting their AK-47s in the air," he said.

Vallely warned that Iraq is just one campaign in a larger American war against terrorism. "The next campaign may be against North Korea, Iran, or Syria," he said.

Commenting on Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, McInerney argued that the US-sponsored road map is a positive development but only as a first step.

"Hope isn't a strategy," the ex-USAF officer said. "You still have to go after the terrorists."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; fox; iraq; us; war; weapons; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-255 last
To: foreverfree
I stand corrected. Thank you.
241 posted on 07/12/2003 6:42:33 PM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: rintense
I agree that regardless of what they are saying now, Cheney will drop from the ticket (but remain part of the administration).

Rudy as CIA head is EXCELLENT! Kudos!
242 posted on 07/12/2003 6:47:41 PM PDT by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree
thats when Powell held up the vile of anthrax as an example, at least we know for sure that was real, just ask Tom Brokaw, the folks at the National Enquirer in Florida, and those postal service employees.
243 posted on 07/12/2003 6:51:48 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Cacophonous
I stand corrected. Thank you.

You're welcome.

foreverfree

244 posted on 07/12/2003 7:00:04 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: lawgirl
Like I said in my previous post, if the administration is to do that, they need to be very very careful with their timing to release the info. They may very well caught all the Dems with their pants down, but that doesn't mean majority in this country will go along with Bush's tactics (for the record, I have no problem w/ it as long as it sinks Rat boat).

I think it would be wise for the administration to release the info bit by bit to build momentum for the final bombshell and not leave much trace of political gamemanship. Bush will dominate the podium on this issue, so he and Rove will have to master the timing.
245 posted on 07/12/2003 7:02:39 PM PDT by Schakaljager (no fan of tags)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Schakaljager
Any notion that bush is waiting till next August is sheer idiotcy. To think that Bush's distractors would'nt screem "politics" is hopelessly naive. I can here the America hating left now .."they were planted!!!!!"
246 posted on 07/12/2003 7:09:13 PM PDT by BOOTSTICK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
I said he shouldn't wait until next August, he's credibility would take a big hit if he choose to wait. But as far as the hard-left is concerned, I don't care about their reaction, nothing will ever change their mind. They are the Howard Dean people, why waste your strategy chasing those who will never vote for you?

Screaming politics? Even if Bush comes clean today, the media will scream politics, Bush's goal is to convince the general public, do they think he's playing politics with WMD info? Public perception, not media should be Bush's focus.
247 posted on 07/12/2003 7:23:48 PM PDT by Schakaljager (no fan of tags)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Schakaljager
Even if Bush comes clean today, the media will scream politics,

Yep. The media is on the other side.

248 posted on 07/12/2003 7:32:32 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: yonif
President Bush is serious. He is fully engaged is protecting, defending our country and people.

Democrats are simply senile. Don't give a damn what-so-ever about our national security.

Bush is not playing a game. This is a deadly war for survival we are engaged in. He didn't intend to spend his presidency huntin' down murderous terrorists, but he's got to do it despite democrat interference and lack of attention.

Clinton fouled up. Bush is hitting home runs.

And, the democrats are so jealous and enraged at him for executing successfully his sacred oath of office.

Let them spew and slither. They can never lay a hand on our President. His character eludes their venom.

249 posted on 07/12/2003 7:37:07 PM PDT by harpo11 (All the democrats can do is bitch at Bush just because he took down a murdering dictator thug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
They actually believe that they can hurt Bush through the MEDIA, as though it was a branch of government. Remember Enron? Ooooh, they were so sure they HAD him. Remember BUSH KNEW!? Seen Cynthia McKinney lately? Come on.

I remember one of the lefties at work came in one day with a smirk saying, "We got him now, first he steals the election and now peoples pensions!" Everytime I bring that up now, he tells me to get out of the past!

250 posted on 07/12/2003 7:53:25 PM PDT by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Schakaljager
think it would be wise for the administration to release the info bit by bit to build momentum for the final bombshell and not leave much trace of political gamemanship. Bush will dominate the podium on this issue, so he and Rove will have to master the timing.

For what it's worth and hopefully not repeating anything posted earlier, Senator Warner said today that they already have information regarding WMD. He claims it cannot be released because it is being built slowly through various interviews and they don't want to jeapardize the investigation. There is also some concern, given the unknown status of Saddam, among would be informers. This is a rather large issue, if Saddam is alive and watching the attacks on Bush and Blair, he has to have some sense that he still has a grip on the necks of scientists and other informers. Spoon feeding the American public at the expense of the success of the ultimate outcome might not be the best strategy.

251 posted on 07/12/2003 8:04:48 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
For what it's worth and hopefully not repeating anything posted earlier, Senator Warner said today that they already have information regarding WMD. He claims it cannot be released because it is being built slowly through various interviews and they don't want to jeapardize the investigation. There is also some concern, given the unknown status of Saddam, among would be informers. This is a rather large issue, if Saddam is alive and watching the attacks on Bush and Blair, he has to have some sense that he still has a grip on the necks of scientists and other informers. Spoon feeding the American public at the expense of the success of the ultimate outcome might not be the best strategy.

Good info!

252 posted on 07/12/2003 9:49:30 PM PDT by Susannah (Over 200 people murdered in L. A.County-first 5 mos. of 2003 & NONE were fighting Iraq!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
Dolphy, Thanks for posting this, it was posted once before on this thread but I coud not find it again (EmilyRN?)

I thought that this was very interesting and had not heard it before. It makes alot of sense when you think about it.

253 posted on 07/12/2003 11:05:20 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; lonevoice; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent FoxFan list.

254 posted on 07/14/2003 10:37:04 AM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
If he waits too long to out the evidence I fear the media and the libs will have turned him into a liar in the minds of joe sixpack. They will not believe the truth of discovered WMD after that point.
255 posted on 07/14/2003 10:40:01 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrisssssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-255 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson